Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:28:54 -0500
Virgil said:
> In article <MPG.1dd15ad9caf3df8a98a5ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Tony Orlow <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Russell said:
> > > Daryl McCullough wrote:
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > Hilbert wondered whether the reals could be well-ordered.
> > >
> > > Wouldn't such a well-ordering have to be complicated enough
> > > that it couldn't be used to decide CH? (Since CH is undecidable,
> > > right?) It's hard for me to imagine how a well-ordering of the
> > > reals could be specified in any book of finite length while still
> > > leaving CH undecided.
> > >
> > >
> > Did you look at my web page?
>
> Since TO starts with a whole raft of conditions contrary to fact, there
> is no need to punish oneself perusing such garbage.
>
So, you choose to participate in a conversation in total ignorance of the
subject matter, deliberately? Screw you, loser. I'll waste no more time on you
then.
--
Smiles,
Tony
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/aeo6/WellOrder/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Virgil
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- References:
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Russell
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Virgil
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Prev by Date: Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Next by Date: Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Previous by thread: Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Next by thread: Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|