Re: Real Tetration Solution
- From: "Ioannis" <morpheus@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 14:50:24 +0200
Ο "Andrew Robbins" <and_j_rob@xxxxxxxxx> έγραψε στο μήνυμα
news:18959713.1130908349752.JavaMail.jakarta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi,
[snip]
> Most of my research recently has been numerical, I've tried to extend
tetration algebreicaly, as have many others, without much success. When I
focused purely on numerical solutions, I started trying to find different
ways of stating the problem of tetration. I started by assuming that the
solution be infinitely differentiable, rather than simply continuous, and
also felt that monotonic, or always positive derivatives were neccessary. So
I tried plugging the conditions into Solve[] because DSolve[] wacks out, and
still no solution. I tried using series expansions around several different
expansion points, and still no solution. Some points do give a solution, but
its oscillating, and changes as soon as you add one term to the series
expansion, so the sequence of series terms doesn't converge.
>
> Recently I did something different, and it worked! I did it! I solved the
problem of continuous tetration! But in a very roundabout way. I did it by
providing the conditions that slog_b(x) be infinitely differentiable
(actually only n-times differentiable) into Solve[], and got numbers that
would CONVERGE for higher values of n. So we can now find the true value of
e^^pi == x because we now know the true value of slog_e(x), and can solve
that for when slog_e(x) == pi.
>
> I'm thinking of writing a paper about this, but I have no idea where I
should submit it, any suggestions would be nice. But before I do, anyone
interested can ask me at and_j_rob(at)yahoo(dot)com and I will try and send
something to anyone interested in this numerical solution.
[snip]
Hi Andrew,
The good news is that such a solution is very interesting if indeed you've
got it. Much more interesting that a simple continuous solution. The bad
news is that an infinitely differentiable solution has already been
constructed and what's worse, in that same paper the author proves that
there are infinitely many infinitely differentiable solutions (as well as
infinitely many simply continuous solutions), in a paper which has already
been submitted for publication:
http://users.forthnet.gr/ath/jgal/math/ExtensionsPaper.html
Consequently, you still cannot talk about "the" value of, for example,
e^^pi, or things similar.
The really hard part, is finding a _real analytic_ solution, which, as far
as I know, has not been done yet analytically, but can certainly be done
numerically, using series approximations.
For some good attempts on the later, you can check out David Rusin's pages
[ref 29] on the above paper.
Cheerio,
> Andrew Robbins
--
I. N. Galidakis
http://users.forthnet.gr/ath/jgal/
Eventually, _everything_ is understandable
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Real Tetration Solution
- From: Andrew Robbins
- Re: Real Tetration Solution
- References:
- Real Tetration Solution
- From: Andrew Robbins
- Real Tetration Solution
- Prev by Date: Re: What is the approximating density of this sequence?
- Next by Date: Re: ideal gas theory
- Previous by thread: Real Tetration Solution
- Next by thread: Re: Real Tetration Solution
- Index(es):