Re: Set Theory-Axiom of Congruence.
- From: "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:40:31 +0100
"zuhair" <zaljohar@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Jesse F. Hughes wrote:
>> "zuhair" <zaljohar@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> >
>> > Proove that it makes the system inconsistent!
>>
>> You've probably been shown the proof that |N| = |N \ {0}| a time or
>> two. Clearly that contradicts your axiom.
>
> Their is not proof of |N | = |N\{0}| , all proofs I've been shown till
> now
>
> doesn't describe the set N/{0} properly , their is a confusion between
>
> the set N/{0} and the set N' = 1,2,3,4,.............. , I have
> repeatedly said
>
> that these two sets are totally different sets , the first has lower
> cardinality
>
> than the other.
It doesn't really matter what you've said. The proof that
|N| = |N \ {0}|
is very simple, trivial to formalize and verify as a correct proof in
the theory ZF using utterly standard rules of inference and logical
axioms.
That you've said it isn't so doesn't change this fact.
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"History will hate you and love me. I'm the misunderstood and
persecuted genius. You're the assholes." -- James Harris
.
- References:
- Set Theory-Axiom of Congruence.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Set Theory-Axiom of Congruence.
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Set Theory-Axiom of Congruence.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Set Theory-Axiom of Congruence.
- From: Robert Low
- Re: Set Theory-Axiom of Congruence.
- From: zuhair
- Set Theory-Axiom of Congruence.
- Prev by Date: Re: Kline on Mathematics
- Next by Date: minitaller
- Previous by thread: Re: Set Theory-Axiom of Congruence.
- Next by thread: Re: Set Theory-Axiom of Congruence.
- Index(es):