Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Robert Low <mtx014@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:53:22 +0000
MoeBlee wrote:
Tony Orlow wrote:If there are no limit ordinalsIf we add the assumption that there are no limit ordinals then you've made set theory inconsistent.
You could do ZF with the axiom of infinity replaced by its negation. You wouldn't have limit ordinals then... .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- References:
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Prev by Date: Re: *an* infinite number
- Next by Date: Re: Asymptotic behaviour.
- Previous by thread: Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Next by thread: Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Index(es):
Loading