Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:01:32 -0500
David R Tribble said:
> Tony Orlow wrote:
> > You see, as far as I am concerned, there is no smallest infinite,
> > as one can subtract a finite, or divide by a finite, and get a smaller infinite
> > number, just like you say there is no largest finite. So, omega means nothing
> > to me. I deal with a unit infinity which I generally call N, which represents,
> > not some definite number, but the 1-1 correspondence between element count and
> > element value, 1 element per unit of value, across the infinite real line. It
> > can be thought of as the length of the infinite line, and the number of unit
> > segments and natural numbers in the line, but isn't really a particular number.
> > It's more of a variable which can take on infinite values.
>
> Now you are contradicting yourself. You have stated that 'N' is your
> "standard unit infinity", and that it is:
> N = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ...
>
> This makes your 'N' a distinct NON-variable value.
> Or have you changed your mind about it?
>
>
Oh, does it? Precisely how many 1's are added in that infinite sum of 1's? A
specific number, or some infinite indefinite number? You say "aleph_0", but
what does that really mean? It's not an actual number, as you yuorself admit.
--
Smiles,
Tony
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/aeo6/WellOrder/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- References:
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: boink
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: boink
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: boink
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: boink
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Prev by Date: Re: 3rd deriv exists, convergent function
- Next by Date: Re: algorithm tree type question
- Previous by thread: Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Next by thread: Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|