Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: "zuhair" <zaljohar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Nov 2005 09:31:32 -0800
No. The statement was
such that a_i not equal to b_j for
any i not equal to j.
I.e. the exact opposite of what you state, the sets are
essentially identical if a_i <> b_j for different values
of the index. (In which case there is a simple bijection
between A and B, just flip the ordered pairs).
-William Hughes
.................................................................................
Well in that case you are right!
But it proves that subcardinality is an inspiring concept!
Zuhair
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- References:
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: zuhair
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: zuhair
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: zuhair
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: zuhair
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: zuhair
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: zuhair
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: zuhair
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cardinality and injection
- Prev by Date: Re: topological conjugacy
- Next by Date: Understanding algebraic number theory
- Previous by thread: Re: Cardinality and injection
- Next by thread: Re: Cardinality and injection
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|