Re: topological conjugacy
- From: "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:53:41 -0500
In <dm25bv$24m7$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 11/23/2005
at 04:28 PM, magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arturo Magidin) said:
>I'm imagining a bounded cyclinder.
Okay. That was one of the possibilities I listed, and it is clearly
homeomorphic to a solid ball. Given that what you wrote is clear.
Thanks.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not
reply to spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- topological conjugacy
- From: Andrew
- Re: topological conjugacy
- From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
- Re: topological conjugacy
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: topological conjugacy
- From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
- Re: topological conjugacy
- From: Arturo Magidin
- topological conjugacy
- Prev by Date: Re: Group actions
- Next by Date: Re: Cardinality and injection
- Previous by thread: Re: topological conjugacy
- Next by thread: Centralizers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|