Re: it's just simple questions..please answer these.



On 24 Nov 2005 23:23:13 -0800, "yakuza" <koninja@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>hi nice to see all of you here this group
>I've got some problems in doing mathematics. and they are so simple
>so please don't go off now~~!
>first of all the statement of the exercise is 'perform the indicated
>operations on a calculator. Assume that all numbers are approximate.'
>and the problems are
>
>1. 3.168 + 53.91 ÷ (-17.85)
>2. 0.0350 - 0.0450/1.909 <---- as you knew, on
>the right is a fraction.
>
>as you knew
>
>the operations with approximate numbers
>1. When approximate numbers are added or subtracted, the result is
>expressed with the precision of the least precise number.
>2. When approximate numbers are multiplied or divided, the result is
>expressed with the accuracy of the least accurate number.
>3. When the root of an approximate number is found, the result is
>expressed with the accuracy of the number.
>and in the addition, where there is a combination of operations, the
>final operation determines how the final result is to be rounded off.
>for instance,
>in 38.3 - 12.9(-3.58) = 84.482, we know that
> 38.3 - 12.9(-3.58) = 38.3 + 46.182 = 84.482
>if those numbers are approximate, we must round off the result to
>tenths, which means the sum is 84.5
>(if my explanations are not sufficient then request more and then I'll
>do more)
>in the book, the solutions are written as
>
>1. 0.148
>2. 0.0114
>
>do you think it is right? I think it is strange. I think the solutions
>to them is to be written as
>
>1. 0.15
>2. 0.011
>
>what do you think of it???????????????????????????????????????
>please give some advice about it.

The range of possible answers is:

for problem (1): .1462055198 to .1494577149

for problem (2): .01134507467 to .01150980623

so I like your answers better than the answers from the book.

quasi
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Response to Karen and to Willem on recursive proofs
    ... Because programming is APPLIED mathematics. ... than two places of precision. ... It appears that computer scientists with heroic exceptions like ... To sniff like a maiden aunt, "there is no excuse" is to be in denial ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Re: Godel and Kant, and incompleteness
    ... precision we employ for object definitions in the physical world. ... Mathematics could not be more precise than this. ... These modelling brics are again idealized ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Applications of Mathematics
    ... precision using floating-point arithmetic. ... scientific mathematics. ... for determining mathematical nonsense? ... Toni Lassila, who I realize now was probably mocking ...
    (sci.math)
  • its just simple questions..please answer these.
    ... I've got some problems in doing mathematics. ... the right is a fraction. ... expressed with the precision of the least precise number. ... When the root of an approximate number is found, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Assembly Language - Mathematics WITHOUT maths coprocessor
    ... So I think my answer of 12.04119983 is a little more correct, as 40 bits can hold as many values as 12 decimal digits, plus just a little bit more. ... multiply by 2 ^ precision, you shift it left by precision. ... Convert fraction part to binary as if it were an integer. ... Divide fraction part by what step 4 effectively multiplied it by. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)