Gram-Schmidt process



Is it true that if {w1, w2, ..., wn} is an orthogonal
set of nonzero vectors, then the vectors v1, v2,..., vn
derived from the Gram-Schmidt process satisfy vi=wi,
for i= 1,2, ..., n?

If so, can anyone think of a way to prove it? (Possibly
without induction... I don't like it very much....)

I know the orthogonal vectors w1, w2,..., wn are
linearly independent.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Req:Scalar control of induction machine(simulink model)
    ... I need simulink model of v/fcontrol of ac induction ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.soft-sys.matlab)
  • Re: Gram-Schmidt process
    ... >set of nonzero vectors, then the vectors v1, v2,..., vn ... you will pay anything for induction. ... How is the Gram-Schmidt process defined? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Subnormal quasisimple subgroups
    ... > Maybe we don't really need induction. ... the punch posting it. ... Jim Heckman ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantor and the binary tree
    ... I am glad that there is no last one which could spoil my proof. ... > The proof, using complete induction, does not work for a last one. ... finite and the number on the left hand side is always inite and the last ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: infinity
    ... > My induction is about the set defined by each n in N. All n are largest ... > predecessors. ... But that does not contradict which is about a set ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)

Loading