Re: Area and volume of solid of revolution



On Nov 27, 2005 12:40 PM CT, RCA wrote:

> My question is - why does the area under the curve
> calculation ignore the "arc length" aspect.

Because we do not need to know the arc length of a curve
when finding the area under that curve.

> The arc length is used as the basis for the surface
> area of revolution

Yes.

> ...while the arc length is approximated to the x
> component while calculating the volume (or the area
> under the curve). I dont understand how that is
> justified.

If by "arc length is approximated to the x component"
you mean integrating the formula

ds = [1 + (f'(x))^2]^(1/2) dx

...then no.

When finding the area under a curve we don't need to
calculate the arc length of this curve. The arc length
does not come into play when doing solids of revolution.

Maybe if we take a specific example things will clear up
a bit. Let's find the volume of a unit sphere and the
surface area of a unit sphere.

A circle of radius one centered at the origin is given
by the equation x^2 + y^2 = 1. The upper half of this
circle is given by y = [1 - x^2]^(1/2) and so we obtain

f(x) = [1 - x^2]^(1/2).

Now if we take the area under this curve and rotate it
about the x-axis we will obtain a sphere of radius one
centered at the origin.

Take a thin slice of this sphere perpendicular to the
xy-plane that goes through the point x = a. This thin
slice is a disk with radius f(a) and so the area of this
disk is pi * [f(a)]^2.

Thus, the volume for our sphere should be the integral
of pi * (1 - x^2) * dx from -1 to 1. Indeed, if we
evaluate this integral we get 4 * pi / 3, which is the
volume of a unit sphere.

It is important to see that we did not use arc length at
all to find this. All we did was take an area under a
curve, rotate this area, and then use calculus to find
our volume.

Now let's find the surface area of this unit sphere. If
we rotate the just the curve f(x) = [1 - x^2]^(1/2) about
the x-axis we will have a hollow sphere. Recall from the
previous post that the arc length of this curve is given
by the integral of

ds = [1 + (f'(x))^2]^(1/2) * dx

...and in this particular case we obtain...

ds = (1 - x^2)^(-1/2) * dx.

Now the infinitesmial area element is given by dS = 2 *
pi * f(x) * ds, and so the surface area is the integral
of dS from -1 to 1. In this case the integral becomes
2 * pi * dx which evaluates to 4 * pi.

Regards,
Kyle
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: sin x / x tends to 1...
    ... >>>polygon stuff, which we can regard as mere detail, you (and one or two ... But if you think about what it is saying, ... >arc length and the length of the "ruler" will become insignificant. ... It's saying that the length of a certain curve is ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: arc length of quadratic curve
    ... the point is that if you know how to measure arc length of a straight ... Can we not think of a curve as a series of connected straight line segments? ... divisions we get a better approximation and in the limit one has the "true" ... can I use the same function for quadratic curve also or what can be ...
    (comp.graphics.algorithms)
  • Re: Windshield Height Question
    ... Take a large piece of art paper, tape it tightly around the entire top half of the w/s with some overlapping the top. ... That's more or less what I did the last time, but you can't just slide the curve down. ... when you slide the curve down you have to adjust the lower end points so that they match the existing edge points of the original windshield. ... That changes the arc considerably. ...
    (rec.motorcycles.harley)
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability
    ... Your statement of "infinite induction" includes no such definition. ... One can define a curve as being a continuous image of a real interval ... limiting curve is not sufficient for preserving arc length. ... what we mean by the words we use; and mathematics is the domain ...
    (sci.math)