Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: "David R Tribble" <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Nov 2005 11:59:13 -0800
David R Tribble said:
>> It's your math, Tony. How can you draw any conclusions from it if it's
>> not established yet?
>
Tony Orlow wrote:
>> The set is established and some properties are established, but all the
>> arithmetic rules of this number system have not been explored. I assign you the
>> task of figuring out how to add two H-riffic numbers in their native format. I
>> await your findings with great anticipation. Good luck!
>
David R Tribble said:
>> Do your own homework. Why would I waste my time on
>> something that I know is wrong?
>
Tony Orlow wrote:
> Wrong? You think the H-riffic numbers are "wrong"? What is wrong with them?
> They are a number system with a structure that works. They may not be great for
> everything, but they are certainly not "wrong". That's just a dumb remark that
> says you aren't interested in whether there is anything interesting to
> discover.
Okay, prove something simple like f+1 > f for all infinite f.
Show that the sum of the digits for f+1 is greater than the sum of the
digits for infinite f.
I admit that I can't because I can't create a workable definition for
infinite numbers, so that addition, comparison, etc. work properly.
But your definitions so far are no better.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- References:
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Sean West
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Prev by Date: Game Of Differences
- Next by Date: Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Previous by thread: Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Next by thread: Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|