Re: No multiples of 5 in the Lucas sequence
- From: Gottfried Helms <helms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 13:43:44 +0100
Am 03.12.2005 13:14 schrieb Gottfried Helms:
> Some additional remarks:
>
> Still it is much interesting to me, that the order can be greater than
> p, and also it is of interest, to which extent this can happen?
>
It seems, that primefactors of the form +-1 (mod 5)
of the fibonacci-sequence (function f(n))
behave "well", thus their cyclic subgroup-order
is divisor of p-1= phi(p),
and primefactors of the form +-2 (mod 5) have an order
of a divisor of p+1 = phi(p)+2
and the single primefactor 0 (mod 5) has itself as the order.
Gottfried Helms
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No multiples of 5 in the Lucas sequence
- From: cbrown
- Re: No multiples of 5 in the Lucas sequence
- References:
- No multiples of 5 in the Lucas sequence
- From: Mark Jason Dominus
- Re: No multiples of 5 in the Lucas sequence
- From: Keith A. Lewis
- Re: No multiples of 5 in the Lucas sequence
- From: cbrown
- Re: No multiples of 5 in the Lucas sequence
- From: Gottfried Helms
- Re: No multiples of 5 in the Lucas sequence
- From: Gottfried Helms
- No multiples of 5 in the Lucas sequence
- Prev by Date: Re: Interior and gradient (please help)
- Next by Date: Re: very basic logic questions
- Previous by thread: Re: No multiples of 5 in the Lucas sequence
- Next by thread: Re: No multiples of 5 in the Lucas sequence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|