Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Virgil <ITSnetNOTcom#virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 14:44:03 -0700
In article <MPG.1dfe65ec152d14598a819@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tony Orlow <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Virgil said:
> > Density is not a matter of scale. An ordered set is dense if and
> > only if between any two members there is another member.
>
> It really is. If you stand infinitely back and look at the number
> line, the integers look dense on that scale. It's a matter of
> relatively infinitesimal distance between elements of the set, is
> all.
"Dense" has a mathematical meaning in the contesxt of ordered sets. In
mathematical discussions such meanings take priority over any
non-mathmatical meanings. And I would like to see TO try to stand
infinitely far back from any line.
> > Here is one more question: Imagine a "TO-number" with zeros from
> > its left end rightward to the furthest extent covered by some known
> > internal "limit point', and all 1's from there on rightward. What
> > is its successor?
> A 1 where the rightmost 0 is, and 0's from there rightward,
But according to TO's own descriptions, there cannot be any such
"rightmost" zero. To the right of any limit point (except the right end
point) there is an unending sequence of digits each finitely far from
that limit point, so there cannot be a "last" one.
> just like
> regular binary naturals would be.
Not at all like regular binaries (with only finitely many digits in
each) would be.
> Carry the increment across all 1's to the first 0,
Which can not exist in TO's construction!
> and invert that portion of the string. This is the
> general rule for increment in binary: locate the rightmost 0, and
> invert all bits up to and including that bit.
How can one locate the rightmost digit among a set of digits for which
there is no rightmost?
Or does TO have some finite upper bound on the number of digits that one
"limit point" can cover?
> > > >
> > > > > What is it you hate so much about me or my ideas? Is it just
> > > > > because I smell like a cat?
> > > >
> > > > I am quite fond of most cats. But ideas that are
> > > > self-contradictory and people who try to sell them I am not
> > > > fond of.
> >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- References:
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Matt Gutting
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Virgil
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Virgil
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Virgil
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Prev by Date: inverse of f(x) = e^x + x + 3
- Next by Date: Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Previous by thread: Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Next by thread: Re: Well Ordering the Reals
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|