Re: Dedekind Domain
- From: magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arturo Magidin)
- Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:18:37 +0000 (UTC)
In article <YTVof.3464$j7.82123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Timothy Murphy <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>>> >> Let R be a domain with the property that every nonzero ideal
>>> >> is a product of maximal ideals. Show that R is Dedekind.
[.snip.]
>I was just thinking about this result,
>and wondering if it is as difficult as seems to be implied.
I did not mean to imply it is difficult. The proof in Jacobson is
short and straightforward; but since it relies on the notions of
fractional ideals, I thought it best to simply give the reference.
Sorry I can't be more detailed; I'm away from the office, and plan to
leave town later today.
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- [Question] Dedekind Domain
- From: Taedong Yun
- Re: [Question] Dedekind Domain
- From: Bill Dubuque
- Re: Dedekind Domain
- From: magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Dedekind Domain
- From: Timothy Murphy
- [Question] Dedekind Domain
- Prev by Date: Re: Proper classes
- Next by Date: Re: Proper classes
- Previous by thread: Re: Dedekind Domain
- Next by thread: lcm (p-1,p^n-1)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|