Re: help proving that limit of piecewise function DNE
- From: mskirvin@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 18 Dec 2005 16:44:45 -0800
R. Colacitti wrote:
> R. Colacitti wrote:
> > given:
> >
> > f: R -> R
> >
> > f(x) = { 0 if x is rational
> > { 1 if x is irrational
> >
> >
> > objective:
> >
> > prove that as x->0 , f(x) has no limit (limit does not exist)
> >
> >
> > what I tried and failed miserably with:
> >
> > I noticed that 0 <= f(x) <= 1 for x /in R
> >
> > and since lim 0 != lim 1 as x->0 , I claimed that lim f(x) as x->0 does
> > not exist
> >
> > *BASED ON A COROLLARY OF THE SQUEEZE THEOREM (something which isn't
> > generally true)
> >
>
> I should have said "CONVERSE" not "COROLLARY"
>
> >
> > Any hints on how I should start in trying to prove that the limit does
> > no exist?
As a hint, every neighborhood of 0 contains an irrational number.
Mike
.
- References:
- help proving that limit of piecewise function DNE
- From: R. Colacitti
- Re: help proving that limit of piecewise function DNE
- From: R. Colacitti
- help proving that limit of piecewise function DNE
- Prev by Date: Re: Mathmatical expression for graph?
- Next by Date: Re: Please help with wikipedia's article on Arabic Numerals that's falling victim to vandalism
- Previous by thread: Re: help proving that limit of piecewise function DNE
- Next by thread: Re: help proving that limit of piecewise function DNE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|