Re: Not sure about interpretation of this set notation
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:07:03 -0800
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Kenneth Bull wrote:
> X = { a /in B | a = 2k, k /in A }
>
> I am not sure about the k part. Does the above notation imply that
> "every k" in A must be considered (just like every a in B must be)?
>
The expression lacks coherence and should be stated as
X = { a in B | some k in A with a = 2k }
= { 2k in B | k in A }
= B /\ 2A
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Not sure about interpretation of this set notation
- From: Kenneth Bull
- Re: Not sure about interpretation of this set notation
- References:
- Not sure about interpretation of this set notation
- From: Kenneth Bull
- Not sure about interpretation of this set notation
- Prev by Date: Re: Wikipedia alternative aims to be 'PBS of the Web'
- Next by Date: Re: Two envelopes and game theory
- Previous by thread: Re: Not sure about interpretation of this set notation
- Next by thread: Re: Not sure about interpretation of this set notation
- Index(es):