Re: Two envelopes and game theory
- From: "LordBeotian" <pokispy76@[CANCELLA QUESTO]yahoo.it>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:24:56 +0100
"Kees" <kees@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto
>> > OP was wondering about a strategy when n is big. My
>> comment should hint
>> > that for large n all strategies almost equal. To
>> make it precise: given
>> > two strategies let X be the ammount won after n
>> step using strategy 1 and
>> > Y the ammount gained from strategy 2. Then X/Y
>> tends to 1 as n tends to
>> > infintiy.
>>
>> But when infinity is not reached and n is a *fixed*
>> big amount there could
>> be a strategy (eventually depending on n) that works
>> better that any other
>> one.
>>
>>
>
> True, but for big n the differences between the worst and the best
> strategies will be very small. It might still be interesting to find,
> given the bound, the best strategy, but of very little value.
I would like to understand how the best strategy is defined for any fixed
number of rounds.
.
- References:
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory
- From: LordBeotian
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory
- From: Kees
- Re: Two envelopes and game theory
- Prev by Date: Re: Two envelopes and game theory
- Next by Date: Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement
- Previous by thread: Re: Two envelopes and game theory
- Next by thread: Re: Two envelopes and game theory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|