Re: Automatic Theorem Prover

"Chris Osborn" <osbornc@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> What's more, I don't see any reason not to DEFINE truth as
> provability.

Provability in what sense?
.

References:
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover
  - From: Chris Osborn
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover
  - From: Kees
- Re: Automatic Theorem Prover
  - From: Chris Osborn

Relevant Pages

Re: Crash and Burn (Scoring Trends)
... > I've got all that data, but the truth is that (for some reason) I ... > to be able to hit the back of a basketball with a 600cc clubhead. ... Prev by Date: ...
(rec.sport.golf)
Re: The Law of the Excluded Middle again (long)
... grounds that truth means provability, then the truth of a statement ... How in the world would it make any statement true? ... Therefore x>= 0 (reason: prior line) ...
(sci.math)
Re: Donkey Manifesto Holiday Contest - FREE MONEY
... If you want to know the truth. ... For some reason I developed this thing against you and that Mysterious Ace ... I seem to have forgotten what the posts were about. ... Prev by Date: ...
(rec.gambling.poker)
Re: Donkey Manifesto Holiday Contest - FREE MONEY
... If you want to know the truth. ... > For some reason I developed this thing against you and that Mysterious Ace ... I seem to have forgotten what the posts were about. ... Prev by Date: ...
(rec.gambling.poker)
Re: The Law of the Excluded Middle again (long)
... "Inside the scope of quantification, ... to equate (or confuse) truth with provability." ...
(sci.math)