Re: Simple Topology Question

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:08:34 +0100, Jannick Asmus
<jannick.news@xxxxxx> wrote:

>On 31.12.2005 17:20, David C. Ullrich wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:26:04 +0100, Jannick Asmus
>> <jannick.news@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> [...]
>>>I propose to go back to one of the standard
>>>proofs of Baire's theorem. A really small modification can help us.
>>
>>
>> Certainly a tiny modification of the proof gives the present
>> result - that seemed like cheating.
>
>At least it gives us obe /proof/.

Not important: Was that a typo for something or does
"obe" mean something?



************************

David C. Ullrich
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: directional derivative,--
    ... David C. Ullrich wrote: ... if it is indeed standard to consider only entire lines through ... This example shows that zero local slope is not in contradiction to positive average slope. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Descriptions, Presuppositions, Liar,...
    ... No, most people, in particular anyone dealing with standard ... So a logic of presuppositions IS conceivable after all. ... David C. Ullrich ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: A implies I
    ... David C. Ullrich wrote: ... What do you mean by standard meaning? ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Is there any dense subspace in BS?
    ... Dunno about standard, and I've seen _ and ^, but it ... David C. Ullrich ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Peanos space-filling curve
    ... I've replied to four posts in one to save space and time. ... David C. Ullrich wrote in message ... I have difficulty with 'separate' applied to ordered reals. ...
    (sci.fractals)