Re: Q:About primes?
- From: Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 06 Jan 2006 14:06:04 +0200
"Joseph Fagan" <noemailplease@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> "Phil Carmody" <thefatphil_demunged@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:87irsxk45d.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Dan <30pack@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> This prime below with 749 digits required 17+ hours to
> >> establish its primality.
> >>
> > ...
> >>
> >> Whereas this prime below with 751 digits that is more
> >> than 60 times the size of the above prime
> >
> > What on earth are you gibbering on about?
> >
> > A 751-digit prime is roughly 1.0026 times the size of a 749-digit number.
> >
> > Phil
> Eh?
> 10^751 / 10^749 = 10^2
"You can lead a horse's ass to knowledge, but you can't make him think."
- Bob Silverman
Phil
--
What is it: is man only a blunder of God, or God only a blunder of man?
-- Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900), The Twilight of the Gods
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Q:About primes?
- From: Keith A. Lewis
- Re: Q:About primes?
- References:
- Q:About primes?
- From: Dan
- Re: Q:About primes?
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Q:About primes?
- From: Joseph Fagan
- Q:About primes?
- Prev by Date: Re: Asymptote from a set of data
- Next by Date: Re: Q:About primes?
- Previous by thread: Re: Q:About primes?
- Next by thread: Re: Q:About primes?
- Index(es):