Re: Finite measure


"Gmath" <kannnku@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1136601640.555515.133120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sorry I missed something I try to prove that sup{ u(A) | u(A) is finite
> , A in M} is finite.
>

You need to be more clear as to exactly what you want to show. The
statement above (even with the hypothesis that the measure of the compliment
of an infinite measure set is finite) is false, as easy examples show.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: reccurence and limit
    ... infinite products with 'value 0' are usually not even ... which contradicts lim b_n = 0, ... We have terminated our proof *provided* we can start the induction. ... Thus sup and lim are ...
    (sci.math)
  • (Real Analysis) About semifinite measure!!
    ... t is a semifinite measure ... By definition of sup, there exist F subset of s.t ... < Sum of tfrom 1 to infinite + epsilon ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Finite measure
    ... David C. Ullrich ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: about_sup
    ... Actually the sup is not necessary in the group. ... I think belongs to its completion. ... Sorry for disturbing you. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • dead dead dead...
    ... sup with this place... ... bozak, the real OG... ... leave a voice mail @ 901.205.0886 ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.music.hip-hop)