Re: Proof of the Riemann hypothesis

Gupta Deva wrote:
> Victor Eijkhout submitted this idea :
> > Gupta Deva <deva@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> the point
> >> is, that if a theorem is true, then it should be more than possible
> >> to provide a simple proof of its validity.
> >
> > The facts seem to be against you. Four colour theorem, simple groups,
> > Bieberbach, Fermat.....
> >
> > Victor.
>
> With time it may eventually be possible to find much simpler proofs
> of the theorems you mention - or do you wish to propose, that the
> proofs we know today are the simplest proofs of all possible proofs ?
> Mathematics is a very living and developing science ...
>
> Gupta Deva

Sometimes it's so nice, bounce around like a bunny.

It's NOT just Super VGA!

Insulated farming solutions.

Just pour a big solar panel in a huge crater on Earth.

Then it would be a huge parabolic solar reflector. Instead of beaming
power _FROM_ the satellites, it beams it TO them.

Of course, it would have to be constructed under an opaque dome.

Cheaper than lots of things. Problem with that, it would disturb the
air as birds that flew into the light cone would be vaporized.

That's off-topic. You're talking about a proof of the Riemann
conjecture that is three pages long? What are all those things?

Hypergeometric functions are great.

Ross

.

Quantcast