Using exponents law indiscriminately in Calculus I




The exponent laws are defined for positive bases, yet in Calculus I much manipulation using these laws are done on expressions that aren't guaranteed to be positive. Can someone with experience in Calc 1 (especially the section on chain rule) and it's many manipulations of expressions using exponent laws tell me why we are safe in doing this?


For example

f(x) = x arctan[sqrt_x]

f'(x) = arctan[sqrt(x)] + x * 1/[1 + (sqrt_x)^2] * 1/(2 sqrt_x)

Is simplified (using exponent laws) to

f'(x) = arctan[sqrt_x] + sqrt_x /( 2 + 2x)


What makes it safe for us to do this? Application of the chain rule gave me the above messy f'(x) expression (which is not defined at 0) , but after simplification I get an expression that is defined at 0.


This is a simple example, there are many cases (especially in the section on chain rule) where exponent laws are used on large expressions (not just x as in my example). What makes this safe?

Forward thank you for help.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Using exponents law indiscriminately in Calculus I
    ... > The exponent laws are defined for positive bases, ... > manipulation using these laws are done on expressions that aren't ... > expressions using exponent laws tell me why we are safe in doing this? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Using exponents law indiscriminately in Calculus I
    ... > The exponent laws are defined for positive bases, ... > manipulation using these laws are done on expressions that aren't ... > expressions using exponent laws tell me why we are safe in doing this? ... > but after simplification I get an expression that is defined at 0. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Using exponents law indiscriminately in Calculus I
    ... >The exponent laws are defined for positive bases, ... >expressions using exponent laws tell me why we are safe in doing this? ... Note that in Calculus I this isn't defined for x < 0, ... The manipulations are OK for x> 0. ...
    (sci.math)