Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:48:20 +0100
Tony Orlow <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Jesse F. Hughes said:
>> Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > OK. Fixing first things first: P(a | n) , meaning: the probability that
>> > a fixed natural number a divides an arbitrary natural number n .
>>
>> Great. But I still haven't a clue what that might mean.
>>
>> What does "a divides an arbitrary natural n" *mean*? What sort of
>> event is that and how am I supposed to understand the probability of
>> this event?
>>
>
> Oh, come on Jesse. Han is talking about the probability that a randomly chosen
> natural n is divisible by any given fixed natural a. If you consider an initial
> segment of the naturals, and the limit of this probability as that initial
> segment approaches oo, the probability approaches 1/a, as Han states. You put
> all the natural numbers on balls in your vase and pick one at random. The
> chances that it is an integral multiple of your pre-chosen a is 1/a. As you
> continue to pick random balls, the ratio of them that are integral multiples of
> a will approach 1/a. You get this. It is obvious. Why play dumb?
I understand the probability a divides n when we have a uniform
distribution on initial segments of N (although my terminology may be
off).
It seems you're right that the limit of these values is 1/a.
But there is no uniform distribution on N, so I don't see what Han
means there and your explanation doesn't clarify it.
--
"I arrest anybody I think needs arresting, Mr. Carter, and I'm not in
the habit of explaining why."
"There's a law about that ---"
"You're in Dodge, Mr. Carter." -- Gunsmoke radio show / John Ashcroft
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- References:
- Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: david petry
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Tony Orlow
- Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Prev by Date: Re: ONE
- Next by Date: help with algebra/exponentials please!
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Next by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading