Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
- From: fernando revilla <frej0002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:52:14 EST
E.E. Escultura wrote :
> I simply require that every digit of a number be
> known or computable (in the broad sense). By
> computable I mean there is some algorithm or rule or
> scheme for dtermining every digit uniquely. Thus,
> normal numbers are included. A normal number has
> every digit chosen at random from the basic digits o,
> 1, ..., 9.
>
> Cheers.
I apologize for my previous post. I mean : your theory can not be
criticized by simplly looking one or two lines. The exact sense of my
message was that it is very difficult for a mathematician to assume
something different to the standard construction of real numbers,
even with some degree of hypothethical contradiction.
In that sense ( valid not only in your case ) one has two options:
a) Read seriosly your theory.
b) Keep complete silence.
I have found a link of yours in internet with more details, meanwhile
is better for me option b).
Regards and good luck.
Fernando.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
- From: E. E. Escultura
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
- References:
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
- From: E. E. Escultura
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
- Prev by Date: Re: Galois group calculation
- Next by Date: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Previous by thread: Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
- Next by thread: Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
- Index(es):