Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Virgil <ITSnetNOTcom#virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:35:57 -0700
In article <MPG.1e35cf5559953eeb98a98b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tony Orlow <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> MoeBlee said:
> > Please cite a theorem of set theory such that its negation is a
> > theorem of some other axiomatized theory that you hold to be
> > important. And what are these "other axioms of mathematics" that
> > you have in mind?
> >
> > MoeBlee
> >
> >
> No one axiom needs to be the exact negation of another for
> contradictions to arise between them. Certainly, the notion of an
> infinite number of increments never achieving an infinite value flies
> in the face of infinite series, where a sum can only converge to a
> finite value if the terms have a limit of 0 at oo.
In real mathematics nothing is ever "at" oo, things sometimes are said
to "approach oo" ( which is what "-> oo" means), but one never reaches
it.
Just as in
"lim_{h ->0} [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h = f'(x)"
one never actually has h = 0, so in
"lim_{n -> oo} A_n = B"
one never has n = oo.
Those, like TO, who say otherwise, only advertise their ignorance.
.
- References:
- Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: david petry
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Tony Orlow
- Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Prev by Date: Re: How should mathematical models be produced?
- Next by Date: Inequalities for convex functions
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Next by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|