Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics


Han de Bruijn wrote:
> cbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Perhaps Han should actually read Jaynes' work.
>
> At the moment, I'm doing just that. And I'm becoming more enthousiastic
> on every next page turned.
>
> > (Of course, I doubt that Jaynes would claim that a uniform distribution
> > on the naturals is possible).
>
> Doubt as much as you want, but he does.

Why do you keep making claims like this, then failing to
produce quotes that support them?

> Here comes another quote:

But not one that had anything in particular with anything you
are attributing to Jaynes, such as a uniform distribution on the
naturals.

- Randy

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
    ... >> Han de Bruijn wrote: ... >> are attributing to Jaynes, such as a uniform distribution on the ... > Hey, hey! ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
    ... >>probability that an arbitrary natural is divisible by a fixed natural ... > But now consider the sequence with each A_n consisting of the n lowest ... Perhaps Han should actually read Jaynes' work. ... on the naturals is possible). ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
    ... are attributing to Jaynes, such as a uniform distribution on the naturals. ... And what prevents you from reading the book yourself. ...
    (sci.math)
Loading