Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics

Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Jesse F. Hughes wrote:
>> I suppose now you'll say that my definition of P({i}) makes sense
>> only
>> for *my* definition of N and not *your* definition, which mysteriously
>> grows as needed.
>
> So mysteriously that I can express the idea in a programming language,
> resulting in code that is understood by a stupid machine. I can think
> of two reasons:

Any reason you did not respond to the substantive parts of my post,
where I explained why your sum was irrelevant?

--
"So why are mathematicians NOT what most people suppose? Why are they
not these brilliant and wonderful people who act in favor of humanity
instead of against it?" -- James S. Harris, on public confusion about
mathematicians and superheroes.
.

Relevant Pages
Loading