Re: rotation matrices
- From: Jyrki Lahtonen <lahtonen@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:52:19 +0200
bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
i did try it. it seems to work out.
Try again. It doesn't work out:
Assume that the two rotation have "generic" angles, e.g. the amount of rotation is not an integer multiple of 90 degrees or something special like that.
Let's look at a point P on the y-axis. If you first rotate about the x-axis, then P moves to another point P' on the yz-plane (its x-coordinate is still = 0), Observe that P' is no longer on the y-axis, so when you rotate about the y-axis, P' will then move to a point P'' off the yz-plane.
If you reverse the order of rotations and first rotate about the y-axis, the point P won't move at all (being on the axis of rotation). When you follow up with the rotation about the x-axis P will move to P' (= the same point as above), but that is different from P''. Changing the order of the two rotations thus makes a difference for at least for the point P (it makes a difference for most of the points actually).
Or did you mean something else?
Cheers,
Jyrki .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rotation matrices
- From: bob
- Re: rotation matrices
- References:
- rotation matrices
- From: bob
- Re: rotation matrices
- From: Ted Hwa
- Re: rotation matrices
- From: bob
- rotation matrices
- Prev by Date: Re: rotation matrices
- Next by Date: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Previous by thread: Re: rotation matrices
- Next by thread: Re: rotation matrices
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|