Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics

In article <b5982$43ce0b2b$82a1e2b0$22212@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Virgil wrote:
>
> > We assume that 1/n -> 0 as n -> oo, which is quite different.
>
> Is that so? That makes it even easier to define a uniform distribution P
> on the naturals. As follows: P(arbitrary natural) = 1/n -> 0 as n -> oo.
>
> Han de Bruijn

How does one parse "P(arbitrary natural) = 1/n -> 0 as n -> oo"?

[P(arbitrary natural) = 1/n] -> 0 as n -> oo
or
[P(arbitrary natural) = [1/n -> 0 as n -> oo]
?
.

Relevant Pages