Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: "MoeBlee" <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Jan 2006 20:57:04 -0800
david petry wrote:
> My claim is that *real* mathematics is scientifically applicable
> mathematics, and that *real* mathematics is itself a science. In
> contrast, Cantorian set theory implies the "existence" of world of
> make-believe which has no role to play in the understanding of the real
> world, and hence it is a pseudoscience.
What do you take the real world to be?
MoeBlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: david petry
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- References:
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: david petry
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: david petry
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Prev by Date: Least Absolute Deviations by Repeated Weighted Least-Squares - HELP!
- Next by Date: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Next by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Index(es):