Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 21 Jan 2006 13:50:04 -0800
cbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > a) 1910484810053706146806749192781911979399520614196634287544
> >
> > b) 4121497099935831413222665927505592755799950501152782060571
> >
> > c) 4415557863469637694468527889283375102029398103480215402734
Let me reformulate. Are (a) , (b) and/or (c) _part_ of a "fair and
random"
sequence of elements from {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9} ?
Yes or No is good enough.
Han de Bruijn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: stephen
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- References:
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Next by Date: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Next by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Index(es):