Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Virgil <ITSnetNOTcom#virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:13:07 -0700
In article <1137880204.697862.321670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> cbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > > a) 1910484810053706146806749192781911979399520614196634287544
> > >
> > > b) 4121497099935831413222665927505592755799950501152782060571
> > >
> > > c) 4415557863469637694468527889283375102029398103480215402734
>
> Let me reformulate. Are (a) , (b) and/or (c) _part_ of a "fair and
> random"
> sequence of elements from {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9} ?
>
> Yes or No is good enough.
>
> Han de Bruijn
It is not from the result but from the method of production which
determines whether a sequence was randomly produced. Any sequence of the
same number of digits COULD have been produced randomly if we have, say,
a truly random bit generator, which will produce a 0 or 1 with equal
probability at each request for a binary digit.
In the physical world, the nearest things to mathematical randomness are
quantum events like the spin of an electron being up or down when tested.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- References:
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Prev by Date: Re: Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation
- Next by Date: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Next by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|