Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 23 Jan 2006 13:45:19 -0800
cbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
{ ... whatever he likes ... ]
But all of his arguing simply boils down to the following:
- Pi is fair and random AND Pi is not fair and random
- Sqrt(2) is fair and random AND Sqrt(2) is not fair and random
Yet Chas is claiming that he understands some about randomness.
And he is especially verbose about his abilities w.r.t. logical
reasoning.
Yeah, sure. What more evidence do we need, huh ?
Han de Bruijn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- References:
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Prev by Date: Re: Summation, modulo and decimal
- Next by Date: graph layout algorithm
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Next by thread: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|