Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
- From: "E. E. Escultura" <escultur36@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:40:48 EST
> Finally, I well-define a normal number as one in which every digit is
> chosen at random from the basic digits.
Define random. Do you mean chosen arbitrarily?
Using Dedikind cuts one can prove trichotomy. What new thing have you
proven?
Bob Kolker
I have answered all your questions and posted a partial list of my publications as you requrested. Now where is yours? I am also waiting for the contradiction you claimed you have found in my work.
E. E. Esculura
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
- From: E. E. Escultura
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
- References:
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
- From: Robert J. Kolker
- Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
- Prev by Date: Re: convexity criteria for ODE solutions
- Next by Date: Re: Drawing Tool for Spherical Geometry?
- Previous by thread: Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
- Next by thread: Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
- Index(es):