A Basic Theorem
- From: "TheNakedOne" <Gooberglob@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jan 2006 04:55:50 -0800
..3 repeated = 1/3
3(.3 repeated) = 1
3(.333 repeated)=1
..999 repeated=1
..9 repeated=1
Q.E.D.
Hey everyone, I'm new to sci.math, and this is a proof I gave to many
teachers at my school, yet none of them could give me a clear enough
reason as to why this was incorrect. My personal belief is that because
the repeated (sorry, I couldn't find a superline key) sign means the
task is being done an infinite number of times, then it actually
reaches the number which can not be reached in decimal form. I wanted
to know your thoughts.
Matt
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Basic Theorem
- From: john_ramsden
- Re: A Basic Theorem
- From: Peter Allen
- Re: A Basic Theorem
- From: Virgil
- Re: A Basic Theorem
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: A Basic Theorem
- From: G. A. Edgar
- Re: A Basic Theorem
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: A Basic Theorem
- From: gerben47
- Re: A Basic Theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
- Next by Date: Re: Drawing Tool for Spherical Geometry?
- Previous by thread: Limit of a sequence
- Next by thread: Re: A Basic Theorem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|