Re: Saying you're reasonable


jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
> David Moran wrote:
> > <jstevh@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:1138464859.518354.38610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <deleted>
> > > The people who were certain that the sun had to go around the earth are
> > > long dead now, and their beliefs refuted, right? But aren't there
> > > people who will tell you with certainty that the battle of Jericho DID
> > > take place and that God DID make the sun stand still?
> > >
> > > What makes you different from them?
> > >
> > >
> > > James Harris
> > >
> >
> > Just because something seems reasonable doesn't always mean it is true. I
> > can't remember how it went right off the top of my head, but I remember
> > seeing a "proof" that 1=2. Even though it was labeled as mathematical humor,
> > the algebra leading to that conclusion is legitimate. If someone, who knows
> > more about a field than I do says I'm wrong, then I probably am. You're too
> > pompous to realize that. Too bad you're wasting your life on meaningless
> > crap.
> >
> > Dave
>
> But my research was peer reviewed

The evidence suggests otherwise.

> and published in a mathematical journal.

The evidence suggests otherwise.

>
> Remember, I'm emphasizing RULES and civilized society runs by rules.

You wish.

>
> Right now math society is breaking its own rules, which is why I see
> challenges when there is no room left to challenge my research.
>
> Sure my paper got yanked, in a bizarre way where the only reasonable
> conclusion is that the chief editor succumbed to social pressure,

A much more reasonable conclusion is that the editor
was a victim of fraud, that you knowingly submitted a paper
that you knew was flawed.

> but
> history shows such crap happens with huge results. Most importantly no
> fundamental errors can be shown in the paper,

Yeah, sure. And the Sun goes around the Earth.

> and besides I can easily
> put up the proof in a post, which I've done and that thread is ongoing.
>
> Also the mathematics in my research makes specific predictions, which
> examples are seen to follow, as even by experiment, my ideas work.
>
> The numbers obey the mathematical proof I found, as can be clearly seen
> and has been seen in examples posted over this week.
>
> The problem with people in the throes of religious belief is that they
> can deny the truth, and make statements that can be shredded by a
> rational person--but then the religious person can just claim the
> arguments were not shredded and keep calling themselves, reasonable.

Heretic.

>
>
> James Harris

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Saying youre reasonable
    ... >> take place and that God DID make the sun stand still? ... I'm emphasizing RULES and civilized society runs by rules. ... Also the mathematics in my research makes specific predictions, ... The numbers obey the mathematical proof I found, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Avoiding the Leap Second
    ... no two natural cycles are alike. ... Earth goes around the Sun. So even in one day, ... different direction from the Earth than it was one day ago, ... mathematics, humans would not have come to think of mathematics ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Why be a believer?
    ... > SECOND the Universe is incomprehensible in size and by comparison our World ... > Sun, Stars and Planets revolved around the Earth. ... > Acoran [Supreme] ...
    (alt.religion.christian)
  • COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES
    ... Our sun is in a 105,000-year elliptical orbit around the Procyon ... Sirius A and B which are only 8.5 light years away. ... star of 1.5 earth diameters orbiting 20 earth distances from Sirius A. ... IS GLOBAL WARMING A REALITY? ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Vangas predictions for this world...
    ... began making predictions when she was 16 years old. ... Will start as a normal war, ... 2100 - Man made Sun is lighting up the dark side of the planet Earth. ...
    (soc.culture.indonesia)