Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable


jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
> José Carlos Santos wrote:
> > On 28-01-2006 16:14, jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > Zealots in any area will happily proclaim that they are right and you
> > > are wrong.
> >
> > What do you say about your "achivements"?
> >
> > > My results challenge ideas that have been around for over a hundred
> > > years.
> >
> > It's funny that you never say *which* ideas are challenged by your
> > "results".
> >
> > > Resistance to the proof cannot be on the mathematics as it's too short
> > > and simple.
> >
> > If so, why no one else believes in it besides you? Notice that Copernic
> > and Galileo were not alone. Other persons, in their days, believed that
> > earth moved around the sun. You, on other hand, are alon in this.
> >
>
> What??!!! Are you deluded?
>
> You really think I am alone?

So, been talking to Beckwith lately? Has his clout gotten your
paper published?

I meant his paper.

>
>
> > > SAYING you're reasonable is easy.
> >
> > SAYING that you "results" are correct is easy.
> >
> > > Actually being reasonable when cherished beliefs are challenged is
> > > hard.
> >
> > How do you describe your beliefs? The ones concerning the "fact" that
> > you have discovered an error being taught in Mathematics for over a
> > century?
> >
> > > The people who were certain that the sun had to go around the earth are
> > > long dead now, and their beliefs refuted, right? But aren't there
> > > people who will tell you with certainty that the battle of Jericho DID
> > > take place and that God DID make the sun stand still?
> > >
> > > What makes you different from them?
> >
> > What makes you different from any other crank?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Jose Carlos Santos
>
> Peer reviewed and published math result.

Why was it withdrawn? Plagarism?

> Simple proof that is easily
> checkable and unrefuted by anyone. Direct examples showing the result
> to be correct, and hey, what's with the namecalling?
>
> What makes YOU different from any other crank?

He doesn't associate with Beckwith?

>
> You avoid direct mathematical proof. You dismiss publication in a peer
> reviewed math journal.

You stole that paper from Beckwith, didn't you?

>
> And you call people names!!!

Fucktard.

>
>
> James Harris

.

Quantcast