Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics

Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> One of the things that page says is that "one could consider the FDM
> a subset of the FEM approach". I have proved mathematically that this
> is definitely _not true_. Instead, FDM and FEM prove to be _equivalent_
>
> numerical methods. I can only give references to my own work here:
>
> http://hdebruijn.soo.dto.tudelft.nl/jaar2004/purified.pdf
> http://hdebruijn.soo.dto.tudelft.nl/fototjes/McNeal.htm
> http://hdebruijn.soo.dto.tudelft.nl/jaar2004/purified.zip
> http://hdebruijn.soo.dto.tudelft.nl/fototjes/Unified_a.htm

And this has been published in which peer reviewed journal?

Jiri

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Google Earth
    ... FDM wrote: ... > I'm actually able to zoom in from ... > Elvis' 747 parked at Graceland. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.travel.europe)
  • Re: test!
    ... mensa = stupide (fem) en espagnol. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (soc.culture.belgium)