Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- From: "Minus XVII" <QncyMI@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Jan 2006 15:44:22 -0800
I think it's just his comprehension of english,
taht gets him no end of trouble in satisfying neccesity and/
or sufficiency, or even defining the problem at first reading.
--Give Earth a Trickier *** Cheeny -- out of office, after gigayears!
http://tarpley.net/bush8.htm
http://www.benfranklinbooks.com/
http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac
http://www.wlym.com/pdf/iclc/howthenation.pdf
http://larouchepub.com/other/2003/3048iraq_58_const.html
http://www.rand.org/publications/randreview/issues/rr.12.00/
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/figs/plate01.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- References:
- Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- From: Proginoskes
- Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- Prev by Date: Re: Is my calculus right?
- Next by Date: Re: Affine transformation
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- Next by thread: Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- Index(es):