Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT


ldb wrote (to AP, presumably):
> Let me get on that clue-train with Chris, then. The one where we are
> emotionall and intellectually "off the deep end". I still am yet to see
> you deal with the thing I brought up about 8 threads ago: Prove that
> any non-4--coloarable map must have 5 adjacent countries. You haven't
> done that yet. You say it must be true without any proof. In fact,
> you've been shown a map that is not 4-colorable (and not planar) that
> does not contain 5 adjacent countries, and yet you've ignored it...
>
> If you can prove that any non-4-colorable map must have 5 adjacent
> countries, your proof of the 4CT would be quite impressive.
> Unfortunately, for you, that statement, on which your entire proof
> rests, is not only unproven, but wrong.

And I'm about ready to post a counterexample.

--- Christopher Heckman

P.S. The only hopes that AP has of getting in the history books is that
all science and mathematics in the past 500 years is incorrect.

.

Relevant Pages