Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- From: "Proginoskes" <CCHeckman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jan 2006 14:45:51 -0800
Proginoskes wrote:
> [...]
> Here are the two basic facts that AP is ignoring:
> [...]
>
> (2) If the 4CT is false, that does not immediately imply that there are
> 5 countries which are adjacent to each other. [...]
And now I will give another example. This example has 12 countries, and
they will be called A, B, C, .., L. The following pairs of countries
share a boundary:
A and B, B and C, C and D, D and E, E and A
A and G, G and C, C and I, I and E, E and F, F and B, B and H, H and D,
D and J, J and A
F and K, G and K, H and K, I and K, J and K
L with every other country.
Now if you have a map with these "adjacencies", it will require at
least 5 colors:
(a) If you just color A, B, C, D, and E, you will need at least 3
colors.
(b) If you just color A through K, you will need at least 4 colors.
(c) L has to receive a different color than ANY other country.
So the whole map requires 5 colors (at least). Furthermore, you cannot
find 5 countries which are all adjacent to each other. In fact, you
can't even find FOUR countries which are all adjacent to each other.
--- Christopher Heckman
.
- References:
- Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- From: Proginoskes
- Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- Prev by Date: Re: Is e^x zero in some extended number system?
- Next by Date: Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- Next by thread: Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|