sci.math

• Date Index

---

• Y=XZ, how to compute Pr{y-c<=Y<=y+c | x-c<=X<=x+c}?, Roy
  • Re: Y=XZ, how to compute Pr{y-c<=Y<=y+c | x-c<=X<=x+c}?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Y=XZ, how to compute Pr{y-c<=Y<=y+c | x-c<=X<=x+c}?, Roy
• Equivalence definition of chain homotopy, Patt
• DOT PRODUCT., jeuro2
  • Re: DOT PRODUCT., jeuro2
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DOT PRODUCT., jeuro2
• nth term of a Series when d is not constant, Jeff
  • Re: nth term of a Series when d is not constant, Patrick Coilland
    • Re: nth term of a Series when d is not constant, Jeff
      • Re: nth term of a Series when d is not constant, Patrick Coilland
  • Re: nth term of a Series when d is not constant, gwlucky
  • Re: nth term of a Series when d is not constant, Jeff
    • Re: nth term of a Series when d is not constant, Jonny Realad
• Reflexive Vector Space, bbmcmung
  • Re: Reflexive Vector Space, David C. Ullrich
• Packing problem, news.skynet.be
  • Re: Packing problem, gwlucky
    • Re: Packing problem, Randy Poe
    • Re: Packing problem, news.skynet.be
      • Re: Packing problem, gwlucky
      • Re: Packing problem, Robert Israel
  • Re: Packing problem, news.skynet.be
• Question: List of all possible reduction between NP problems, moti_ba
  • Re: Question: List of all possible reduction between NP problems, stephen
• Generalized Inverses and Underdetermined Systems, junoexpress
  • Message not available
    • Re: Generalized Inverses and Underdetermined Systems, junoexpress
• Re: PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY: THE UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS,CHEMISTRY,BIOLOGY, AND MATHEMATICS, a_plutonium
• laplace equation, quat
  • Re: laplace equation, Robert Israel
• The Multidimensional Man, jnadiaz
• Substitution system spacehogs, Hauke Reddmann
• the doors, william108
  • Re: the doors, Robert Low
  • Re: the doors, Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: the doors, georgie
  • Re: the doors, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: the doors, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• Egyptian fractions, as remainders, Milo Gardner
• Problems finding out the area of a 0.5mm circle., johnpeterson02
  • Re: Problems finding out the area of a 0.5mm circle., Justin
  • Re: Problems finding out the area of a 0.5mm circle., David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Problems finding out the area of a 0.5mm circle., Markus Moll
• Age in days., Michael
  • Re: Age in days., Michael Orion
    • Re: Age in days., Michael
• need a good metric over my definiutions matrix, nikhilbhargav_nsit
• row/column notation in dual space, Bouwman
• Re: More or Less Than the Sum of Its Parts, Clifford J. Nelson
• Deducted from Wilson, carel
• Card pairing probabilities, Phil Freedenberg
  • Re: Card pairing probabilities, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Card pairing probabilities, Michael Harrington
  • Re: Card pairing probabilities, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• How to build strong checksums for a large arrays + file?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx
• Mean of Multivariate Normal Random Vectors over a Region, CWJ Lam
  • Re: Mean of Multivariate Normal Random Vectors over a Region, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Archimedes Pi Algorithm, dave
  • Re: Archimedes Pi Algorithm, Chris Osborn
  • Re: Archimedes Pi Algorithm, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Archimedes Pi Algorithm, Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: Archimedes Pi Algorithm, dave
  • Re: Archimedes Pi Algorithm, Robert Israel
  • Re: Archimedes Pi Algorithm, Ken Pledger
• Help with recursion, robert.w.adams@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Help with recursion, smn
    • Re: Help with recursion, robert.w.adams@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help with recursion, Robert Israel
      • Re: Help with recursion, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Help with recursion, Robert Israel
      • Re: Help with recursion, David C. Ullrich
• Need help on functional derivative, lifanjiang
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Need help on functional derivative, lifanjiang
    • Re: Need help on functional derivative, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
• algebra folks, Rani
  • Re: algebra folks, Robart
    • Re: algebra folks, sysman
• JSH: So weak, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: So weak, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: JSH: So weak, fishfry
  • Re: So weak, Richard Henry
  • Re: JSH: So weak, Gib Bogle
  • Re: JSH: So weak, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: JSH: So weak, Justin
  • Re: So weak, David Moran
  • Re: So weak, Mot Datrix
  • Re: So weak, Habib Salappa
• Need help: Binomial Coefficients Problem, tutorny
  • Re: Need help: Binomial Coefficients Problem, Jules
    • Re: Need help: Binomial Coefficients Problem, tutorny
  • Re: Need help: Binomial Coefficients Problem, Ronald Bruck
  • Message not available
    • Re: Need help: Binomial Coefficients Problem, tutorny
• Mathematical Expressions for American Democracy, dougwedel
  • Re: Mathematical Expressions for American Democracy, Robert Israel
    • Re: Mathematical Expressions for American Democracy, William Elliot
• Hilbert's Geometry Axioms, Chris
  • Re: Hilbert's Geometry Axioms, gwlucky
  • Re: Hilbert's Geometry Axioms, Ken Pledger
    • Re: Hilbert's Geometry Axioms, gwlucky
• dot product = |a| |b| cos(-) true for any dimensional space?, True Raptor
  • Re: dot product = |a| |b| cos(-) true for any dimensional space?, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: dot product = |a| |b| cos(-) true for any dimensional space?, Chris
  • Re: dot product = |a| |b| cos(-) true for any dimensional space?, Robert Low
• Multivariate Newton Rhapson Method, naebad
  • Re: Multivariate Newton Rhapson Method, Robert Israel
• Integral inequality, Jonas
  • Re: Integral inequality, Robert Israel
• Help identifing surface, The Perturbator
• geometry - shapes onto planes, Skippy
  • Re: geometry - shapes onto planes, Watson Ladd
    • Re: geometry - shapes onto planes, Skippy
• deduce info from reduced matrix, Gary Weselle
  • Re: deduce info from reduced matrix, Robert Israel
• Power of 2 divisible by 3, XleonardXcobetX
  • Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, AntiGag
    • Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, gwlucky
  • Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, AntiGag
  • Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, Chip Eastham
    • Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, Carlos Moreno
      • Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, Bill Dubuque
  • Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, Bart Goddard
    • Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Power of 2 divisible by 3, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• Clustering Probabilities, Adam Teasdale Hartshorne
• definition of a pretopology, Alexis Gallagher
• Fourier transform of a frequency dependent gaussian function, csimon
  • Message not available
    • Re: Fourier transform of a frequency dependent gaussian function, csimon
      • Re: Fourier transform of a frequency dependent gaussian function, Robert Israel
• Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, kj
  • Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Robert Low
  • Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, kj
      • Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Jyrki Lahtonen
  • Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Kees
  • Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Marc Olschok
    • Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Virgil
    • Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, kj
      • Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Kees
      • Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Marc Olschok
      • Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Marc Olschok
    • Re: Why f:domain->codomain instead of f:domain->range?, Marc Olschok
• Is e^x zero in some extended number system?, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Is e^x zero in some extended number system?, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: Is e^x zero in some extended number system?, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Is e^x zero in some extended number system?, Robert Israel
    • Re: Is e^x zero in some extended number system?, Dave L. Renfro
• Different kinds of homomorphisms, Martin
  • Re: Different kinds of homomorphisms, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Different kinds of homomorphisms,
• Trascendental equation, rjfmv
  • Re: Trascendental equation, Me
  • Re: Trascendental equation, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Trascendental equation, Chip Eastham
    • Re: Trascendental equation, rjfmv
      • Re: Trascendental equation, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Trascendental equation, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: Trascendental equation, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Trascendental equation, rjfmv
    • Re: Trascendental equation, rjfmv
      • Re: Trascendental equation, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Trascendental equation, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: Trascendental equation, Michael Varney
  • Re: Trascendental equation, ldierckens
    • Re: Trascendental equation, rjfmv
      • Re: Trascendental equation, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Trascendental equation, Virgil
• what is a summand, Chris
  • Re: what is a summand, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: what is a summand, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: what is a summand, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: what is a summand, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: what is a summand, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: what is a summand, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: what is a summand, Robert Low
      • Re: what is a summand, Michael Varney
      • Re: what is a summand, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: what is a summand, Herman Rubin
  • Re: what is a summand-, JEMebius
  • Re: what is a summand, David Ames
    • Re: what is a summand, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: what is a summand, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: what is a summand, Dave Seaman
• Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, BSK
  • Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, a_plutonium
    • Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, gwlucky
    • Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, Christian Bau
    • Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, a_plutonium
      • Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, a_plutonium
      • Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, a_plutonium
      • Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, Proginoskes
      • Re: one sentence proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem; direct method, Proginoskes
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 30, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster
• differential equation question, asdf
  • Re: differential equation question, Patrick Coilland
    • Re: differential equation question, William Elliot
      • Re: differential equation question, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: differential equation question, William Elliot
  • Message not available
    • Re: differential equation question, asdf
  • Re: differential equation question, Robert Israel
    • Re: differential equation question, asdf
  • Re: differential equation question, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• Composition of convex function, Budge
  • Re: Composition of convex function, Robert Israel
• Call for Papers: IMECS 2006 (international multiconference of 14 engineering & scientific computing conferences), imecs2006
• analysis proof help, quat
  • Re: analysis proof help, William Elliot
• Is the function y=1/x discontinuous?, agentmath
  • Re: Is the function y=1/x discontinuous?, Ronald Bruck
  • Re: Is the function y=1/x discontinuous?, Robert Low
    • Re: Is the function y=1/x discontinuous?, agentmath
      • Re: Is the function y=1/x discontinuous?, Robert Low
  • Re: Is the function y=1/x discontinuous?, Arturo Magidin
• Derivate OFa number, NILS BÖRJESSON
  • Re: Derivate OFa number, Alex. Lupas
• Hexpentaquaternions: a two-hand quaternion algebra, Peter M Jack
• What constitutes mathematical maturity?, Karl M. Bunday
  • Re: What constitutes mathematical maturity?, mikeh106@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: What constitutes mathematical maturity?, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: What constitutes mathematical maturity?, matthias
      • Re: What constitutes mathematical maturity?, Herman Rubin
  • Re: What constitutes mathematical maturity?, richard miller
  • Re: What constitutes mathematical maturity?, gwlucky
• Compactness in Hilbert spaces, brittanyUK
  • Re: Compactness in Hilbert spaces, Ronald Bruck
    • Re: Compactness in Hilbert spaces, brittanyUK
    • Re: Compactness in Hilbert spaces, brittanyUK
      • Re: Compactness in Hilbert spaces, Ronald Bruck
• ALL functions are continous!, NILS BÖRJESSON
  • Re: ALL functions are continous!, Michael Varney
    • Re: ALL functions are continous!, Virgil
      • Re: ALL functions are continous!, barr
      • Re: ALL functions are continous!, Michael Varney
    • Re: ALL functions are continous!, Robert Low
  • Re: ALL functions are continous!, Robert Israel
    • Re: ALL functions are continous!, Toni Lassila
  • Re: ALL functions are continous!, Alex. Lupas
• Affine transformation, Arno
  • Re: Affine transformation, gwlucky
    • Re: Affine transformation, Arno
      • Re: Affine transformation, Randy Poe
      • Re: Affine transformation, Arno
      • Re: Affine transformation, Randy Poe
      • Re: Affine transformation, Arno
  • Re: Affine transformation, Toni Lassila
  • Re: Affine transformation-, JEMebius
• Re: JSH: Better explanation?, Rick Decker
  • Re: JSH: Better explanation?, jstevh
    • Re: JSH: Better explanation?, Rick Decker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: Better explanation?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
• Re: Is my calculus right?, gwlucky
  • Re: Is my calculus right?, Michael Varney
    • Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman
      • Re: Is my calculus right?, Michael Varney
      • Re: Is my calculus right?, Ronald Bruck
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is my calculus right?, Watson Ladd
    • Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman
  • Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman
    • Re: Is my calculus right?, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman
      • Re: Is my calculus right?, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman
      • Re: Is my calculus right?, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Is my calculus right?, Mkajuma
      • Re: Is my calculus right?, Mkajuma
  • Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman
    • Re: Is my calculus right?, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Is my calculus right?, Protoman
      • Re: Is my calculus right?, Gib Bogle
• Please help Graph Theory, charleshowardmath
  • Re: Please help Graph Theory, Robert Israel
    • Re: Please help Graph Theory, Chip Eastham
• Show this matrix is not diagonalizable, Carl R.
  • Re: Show this matrix is not diagonalizable, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Show this matrix is not diagonalizable, Robert Israel
    • Re: Show this matrix is not diagonalizable, Carl R.
      • Re: Show this matrix is not diagonalizable, Robert Israel
  • Re: Show this matrix is not diagonalizable-, JEMebius
• Complex Locus, mitch
• Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: JSH: More math, let's see, jstevh
    • Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: JSH: More math, let's see, Tim Peters
• AP: There is a line..., gwlucky
  • Re: AP: There is a line..., Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: AP: There is a line..., Proginoskes
      • Re: AP: There is a line..., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Fourier Series Square Wave, damage
  • Re: Fourier Series Square Wave, gwlucky
    • Re: Fourier Series Square Wave, damage
      • Re: Fourier Series Square Wave, A N Niel
• What is this notation?, brutuz86
  • Re: What is this notation?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: What is this notation?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: What is this notation?, brutuz86
      • Re: What is this notation?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: What is this notation?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: What is this notation?, brutuz86
      • Re: What is this notation?, Virgil
• DON1, please post something., Damir
• Goldbach Conjecture equivalency, lynto008
  • Re: Goldbach Conjecture equivalency, lynto008
    • Re: Goldbach Conjecture equivalency, gwlucky
    • Re: Goldbach Conjecture equivalency, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Goldbach Conjecture equivalency, Jules
    • Re: Goldbach Conjecture equivalency, Fermat
• pre-calc review and single variable calculus text, Chris Lott
  • Re: pre-calc review and single variable calculus text, Michael Varney
  • Re: pre-calc review and single variable calculus text, Herb Martin
    • Re: pre-calc review and single variable calculus text, gwlucky
  • Re: pre-calc review and single variable calculus text, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• College Algebra texts, Chris Lott
  • Re: College Algebra texts, William Elliot
  • Re: College Algebra texts, Michael Varney
  • Re: College Algebra texts, Casey Hawthorne
  • Re: College Algebra texts, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: College Algebra texts, gwlucky
  • Re: College Algebra texts, Karl M. Bunday
• compactness and closed projector, Li Yi
  • Re: compactness and closed projector, A N Niel
    • Re: compactness and closed projector, Li Yi
      • Re: compactness and closed projector, Jannick Asmus
• intuitionistic logic and symmetry, No One
  • Re: intuitionistic logic and symmetry, Robert J. Kolker
    • Re: intuitionistic logic and symmetry, No One
• dual of a category, No One
• Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes
  • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes
  • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Gottfried Helms
    • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes
    • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, a_plutonium
      • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes
      • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, a_plutonium
      • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes
      • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, ldb
      • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes
      • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Minus XVII
    • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes
      • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, a_plutonium
      • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Minus XVII
      • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes
  • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes
  • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes
  • Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT, Proginoskes
• Composite Congruency Example, Steve Schooler
  • Re: Composite Congruency Example, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Composite Congruency Example, Steve Schooler
      • Re: Composite Congruency Example, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Composite Congruency Example, Robert Israel
• JSH: The first to tender his resignation from the JSH movement *was myself.*, Mot Datrix
  • Re: JSH: The first to tender his resignation from the JSH movement *was myself.*, fishfry
    • Re: JSH: The first to tender his resignation from the JSH movement *was myself.*, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: JSH: The first to tender his resignation from the JSH movement *was myself.*, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: The first to tender his resignation from the JSH movement *was myself.*, Gib Bogle
• bases and system in Hilbert space, hujin
  • Re: bases and system in Hilbert space, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: bases and system in Hilbert space, David C . Ullrich
• What do you think of Numb3rs?, innominatetwice
  • Re: What do you think of Numb3rs?, Erik Naggum
    • Re: What do you think of Numb3rs?, Michael Varney
    • Re: What do you think of Numb3rs?, john_ramsden
  • Re: What do you think of Numb3rs?, Michael Varney
  • Re: What do you think of Numb3rs?, Herb Martin
  • Re: What do you think of Numb3rs?, Arturo Magidin
• If pi never repeats..., dougwedel
  • Re: If pi never repeats..., abe . buckingham
  • Re: If pi never repeats..., fishfry
    • Re: If pi never repeats..., dougwedel
      • Re: If pi never repeats..., Jules
      • Re: If pi never repeats..., Proginoskes
      • Re: If pi never repeats..., Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: If pi never repeats..., Dik T. Winter
      • Re: If pi never repeats..., Robert Israel
      • Re: If pi never repeats..., Robert Israel
      • Re: If pi never repeats..., Dik T. Winter
      • Re: If pi never repeats..., Robert Israel
      • Re: If pi never repeats..., fishfry
  • Re: If pi never repeats---, JEMebius
• equations for a pyramid (2-D and 3-D), bodhi2 . 71828
  • Re: equations for a pyramid (2-D and 3-D), bodhi2 . 71828
    • Re: equations for a pyramid (2-D and 3-D), bodhi2 . 71828
• List Structure, T-Dog
  • Re: List Structure, Mot Datrix
  • Re: List Structure, majamin
  • Re: List Structure, Ray Koopman
• center of a triangle, dharmalion2003
  • Re: center of a triangle, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro
  • Re: center of a triangle, Elliott Chapin
  • Re: center of a triangle, Rob Johnson
• Trajectories Ordinary differntial equations, ttt
  • Re: Trajectories Ordinary differntial equations, majamin
• Abstract Algebra books needed, frank z. meng
  • Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, fishfry
    • Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, gwlucky
      • Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, frank z. meng
      • Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, sigoldberg1
      • Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, David Ames
      • Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, sigoldberg1
  • Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, Timothy Murphy
  • Re: Abstract Algebra books needed, Martin . Sleziak
• L^1[0,1] question.., James
  • Re: L^1[0,1] question.., The World Wide Wade
  • Re: L^1[0,1] question.., Jannick Asmus
• Reducing Factorials, tutorny
• GROWTH/DECAY RIDDLE., jeuro2
• Draped Fishing Net, Narasimham
  • Re: Draped Fishing Net, Mot Datrix
    • Re: Draped Fishing Net, Narasimham
  • Re: Draped Fishing Net, James Waldby
• Where is the polytop and polyhedral cone here?, Konrad Viltersten
• a fixed point, eugene
  • Re: a fixed point, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: a fixed point, William Elliot
      • Re: a fixed point, eugene
  • Re: a fixed point, Patrick Coilland
    • Re: a fixed point, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: a fixed point, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: a fixed point, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: a fixed point, Patrick Coilland
    • Re: a fixed point, Ronald Bruck
      • Re: a fixed point, Patrick Coilland
• The math used in Dancing with the stars!, Dan
  • Re: The math used in Dancing with the stars!, Dan
• Definition of Tautology, just for Lester, Robert J. Kolker
  • Re: Definition of Tautology, just for Lester, gwlucky
    • Re: Definition of Tautology, just for Lester, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Definition of Tautology, just for Lester, gwlucky
• JSH: Saying you're reasonable, jstevh
  • Re: Saying you're reasonable, David Moran
    • Re: Saying you're reasonable, jstevh
      • Re: Saying you're reasonable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Saying you're reasonable, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, Michael Varney
      • Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, Michael Varney
    • Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: Saying you're reasonable, We Pretty
• Is the trefoil knot connected to SU(2)?, frank_k_sheldon
  • Re: Is the trefoil knot connected to SU(2)?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• (Alpha-Beta) Triangle, bassam king karzeddin
• Basic Representation Theory question,, James
  • Re: Basic Representation Theory question,, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Basic Representation Theory question,, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: Basic Representation Theory question,, José Carlos Santos
• How to verify that..., zetafunction
  • Re: How to verify that..., Robert Israel
• Convergence problem, ManOfLight
  • Re: Convergence problem, A N Niel
  • Re: Convergence problem, Robert Israel
• Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Alexander
  • Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Tony
    • Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Zeno's paradoxes, math and reality, Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: A correct and complete statement of Zeno's runner paradox, Alexander
• Re: Zeno's paradoxes - What is wrong?, Alexander
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Zeno's paradoxes - What is wrong?, Alexander
• equivalent norms, eugene
  • Re: equivalent norms, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: equivalent norms, eugene
      • Re: equivalent norms, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: equivalent norms, David C. Ullrich
• Laplace transformation, gerthectors
  • Re: Laplace transformation, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Message not available
    • Re: Laplace transformation, gerthectors
• Name for congruence relationship ?, dkfjdklj
  • Re: Name for congruence relationship ?, M.J.T. Guy
    • Re: Name for congruence relationship ?, dkfjdklj
• Using a derivative and calculating an integral, Protoman2050
  • Re: Using a derivative and calculating an integral, A N Niel
    • Re: Using a derivative and calculating an integral, Protoman2050
      • Re: Using a derivative and calculating an integral, A N Niel
      • Re: Using a derivative and calculating an integral, Michael Varney
• JSH: My apologies, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: My apologies, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: JSH: My apologies, Victor Eijkhout
  • Re: My apologies, Tim Peters
• complex analysis: Mobeious functions, HY
  • Re: complex analysis: Mobeious functions, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: complex analysis: Mobeious functions, Keith A. Lewis
• Ordered printout of a Patricia file?, davsf
  • Re: Ordered printout of a Patricia file?, davsf
    • Re: Ordered printout of a Patricia file?, davsf
• JSH: Trivially easy math, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Trivially easy math, Gib Bogle
  • Re: JSH: Trivially easy math, William Hughes
  • Re: JSH: Trivially easy math, The Ghost In The Machine
• dynamic programming on a tree, tenida@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: dynamic programming on a tree, Someonekicked
• self explanatory algebra books, stony
  • Re: self explanatory algebra books pls, jothi16
    • Re: algebra help books pls, snowy
      • Re: algebra help books pls, fishfry
      • Re: algebra help books pls, john_ramsden
      • Re: algebra help books pls, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: algebra help books pls, Ken Pledger
      • Re: algebra help books pls, snowy
  • Re: self explanatory algebra books, fishfry
    • Re: self explanatory algebra books, gwlucky
• Minimimum of N discrete RV, Intiha
  • Re: Minimimum of N discrete RV, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• cartesian vector notation, deniz . bahar
  • Re: cartesian vector notation, gwlucky
  • Re: cartesian vector notation, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: cartesian vector notation, deniz . bahar
  • Re: cartesian vector notation, Clifford J. Nelson
  • Re: cartesian vector notation, Neelavalli
• Representations of infinite groups, lisimba
  • Re: Representations of infinite groups, Jannick Asmus
• Polish space, eugene
  • Re: Polish space, Ulysse Keller
    • Re: Polish space, eugene
• Series sum, ppuedom
  • Re: Series sum, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: Series sum, ppuedom
  • Re: Series sum, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Series sum, ppuedom
      • Re: Series sum, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Message not available
    • Re: Series sum, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Series sum, ppuedom
• 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', Luke Wu
  • Re: 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', A N Niel
    • Re: 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', David W . Cantrell
  • Re: 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', Peter Allen
  • Re: 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', john_ramsden
    • Re: 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', Jannick Asmus
  • Re: 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', Robert Israel
    • Re: 'analytic' vs. 'algebraic', David W . Cantrell
• If you're smart, know plenty, help us with this problem? give us the solution?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: If you're smart, know plenty, help us with this problem? give us the solution?, Mot Datrix
• Re: What is the difference between gram-mass, pound-mass, and kilogram-mass?, Michael Orion
• Buckling column system, Jonie
• A question on locally compactness, eugene
  • Re: A question on locally compactness, Daniel Grubb
  • Re: A question on locally compactness, The World Wide Wade
• msimsl, Andrea
  • Re: msimsl, Dave Seaman
    • Re: msimsl, Andrea
• Existence of pdf and mgf, Olw
  • Re: Existence of pdf and mgf, Robert Israel
    • Re: Existence of pdf and mgf, Olw
• JSH: Math as a religion, jstevh
  • Re: Math as a religion, Boris Uon
    • Re: Math as a religion, G.E. Ivey
  • Re: JSH: Math as a religion, Larry Lard
    • Re: JSH: Math as a religion, abe . buckingham
      • Re: JSH: Math as a religion, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: JSH: Math as a religion, jstevh
    • Re: JSH: Math as a religion, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Math as a religion, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Math as a religion, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: JSH: Math as a religion, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Math as a religion, David C . Ullrich
• Pi to 10 trillion places, robin . bruce
  • Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, Boris Uon
    • Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, Ronald Bruck
      • Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, Boris Uion
      • Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, Ronald Bruck
      • Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, Mot Datrix
      • Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, robin . bruce
      • Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, Peter Webb
      • Re: Pi to 10 trillion places, robin . bruce
• A Basic Theorem, TheNakedOne
  • Re: A Basic Theorem, gerben47
  • Re: A Basic Theorem, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: A Basic Theorem, David R Tribble
  • Re: A Basic Theorem, G. A. Edgar
  • Re: A Basic Theorem, Randy Poe
  • Re: A Basic Theorem, Virgil
  • Re: A Basic Theorem, Peter Allen
  • Re: A Basic Theorem, john_ramsden
• Limit of a sequence, Mate
  • Re: Limit of a sequence, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Limit of a sequence, Mate
      • Re: Limit of a sequence, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Limit of a sequence, The World Wide Wade
    • Message not available
      • Re: Limit of a sequence, Rob Johnson
• Re: Now the short proof, yet again, José Carlos Santos
• Integrate the area of the functions between two,orthogonal vectors., LP
• Implementation of Levenberg-Marquardt method in MATLAB, Dima Stopel
• Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, Tim Peters
      • Re: Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx
• Help: How to combine all 4's into least 6's- Is there a way to calculate what the minimum of 6's will be and then how do it?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx
• how to resolve vector into x-component., jeuro2
  • Re: how to resolve vector into x-component., john
    • Multiplication of vectors., jeuro2
      • Re: Multiplication of vectors., Randy Poe
      • Re: Multiplication of vectors., jeuro2
      • Re: Multiplication of vectors., Randy Poe
      • Re: Multiplication of vectors., jeuro2
      • Re: Multiplication of vectors., john
      • Re: Multiplication of vectors., jeuro2
• Computing Chi-square stats on Card deck, Bill Taylor
• What is your opinion regarding Descarte's vortices?, Bill Taylor
• prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, i . love . jeevitha
  • Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, earthnut@xxxxxx
  • Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, Rob Johnson
    • Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, Ronald Bruck
    • Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, i . love . jeevitha
      • Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, Nathan
      • Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, i . love . jeevitha
      • Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, Nathan
      • Re: prove d|x|/dx = x/|x| without piecewise, i . love . jeevitha
• cardinal number proof, Li Yi
  • Re: cardinal number proof, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: cardinal number proof, David C . Ullrich
• powers of a matrix, Eric
  • Re: powers of a matrix, Eric
• The Silver String, thomasjack
• JSH: Same old crap, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Same old crap, Rupert
  • Re: JSH: Same old crap, Felix Rawlings
    • Re: JSH: Same old crap, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Same old crap, Randy Poe
  • Re: JSH: Same old crap, Proginoskes
    • Re: JSH: Same old crap, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: JSH: Same old crap, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Same old crap, Gib Bogle
      • Re: JSH: Same old crap, Gib Bogle
      • Re: JSH: Same old crap, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Same old crap, fishfry
  • Re: JSH: Same old crap, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: JSH: Same old crap, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: JSH: Same old crap, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: JSH: Same old crap, Larry Lard
  • Re: JSH: Same old crap, Wayne Brown
• a question about book, nonono
  • Re: a question about book, Rupert
    • Re: a question about book, nonono
• Singular homology question.., James
• ? svd for operator, Cheng Cosine
  • Re: ? svd for operator, Robert Israel
    • Re: ? svd for operator, Cheng Cosine
      • Re: ? svd for operator, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: ? svd for operator, Robert Israel
• A problem regarding convolution, John L. Barber
  • Re: A problem regarding convolution, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: A problem regarding convolution, John L. Barber
      • Re: A problem regarding convolution, Robert Israel
      • Re: A problem regarding convolution, John L. Barber
      • Re: A problem regarding convolution, Robert Israel
      • Re: A problem regarding convolution, John L. Barber
      • Re: A problem regarding convolution, John L. Barber
      • Re: A problem regarding convolution, Robert Israel
• What is the maximum area rectangle that can be inscribed inside an equilateral triangle?, Josh
  • Re: What is the maximum area rectangle that can be inscribed inside an equilateral triangle?, Ken Pledger
    • Re: What is the maximum area rectangle that can be inscribed inside an equilateral triangle?, Josh
• Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Robert Israel
    • Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Robert Israel
      • Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Robert Israel
      • Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Robert Israel
      • Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Ronald Bruck
    • Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: Uniqueness of approximation problem in non strictly convex spaces, Ronald Bruck
• entropy: error in wikipedia and planetmath, diegotorquemada
  • Re: entropy: error in wikipedia and planetmath, Robert Israel
    • Re: entropy: error in wikipedia and planetmath, diegotorquemada
• Drawing Tool for Spherical Geometry?, W. Watson
  • Re: Drawing Tool for Spherical Geometry?, Narasimham
  • Re: Drawing Tool for Spherical Geometry?, chasjac
• Solving, northstar
  • Re: Solving, gwlucky
    • Re: Solving, northstar
      • Re: Solving, gwlucky
      • Re: Solving, gthomas
      • Re: Solving, northstar
      • Re: Solving, gwlucky
      • Re: Solving, northstar
      • Re: Solving, gthomas
      • Re: Solving, Virgil
      • Re: Solving, gthomas
  • Re: Solving, Bart Goddard
    • Re: Solving, northstar
      • Re: Solving, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Solving, gthomas
  • Re: Solving, Virgil
    • Re: Solving, jclause
    • Re: Solving, northstar
• Binomial distribution question, carlos . james . r
  • Re: Binomial distribution question, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Binomial distribution question, carlos . james . r
      • Message not available
      • Re: Binomial distribution question, carlos . james . r
      • Message not available
      • Re: Binomial distribution question, carlos . james . r
  • Re: Binomial distribution question, Randy Poe
    • Re: Binomial distribution question, carlos . james . r
      • Re: Binomial distribution question, Dave Seaman
• Re: The numbers don't lie, HallsofIvy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The numbers don't lie, Rick Decker
    • Re: The numbers don't lie, jstevh
      • Re: The numbers don't lie, Rick Decker
      • Re: The numbers don't lie, Tim Peters
      • Re: The numbers don't lie, Larry Lard
      • Re: The numbers don't lie, Tim Peters
  • Re: The numbers don't lie, Rick Decker
  • Re: The numbers don't lie, Rick Decker
  • Re: The numbers don't lie, Jyrki Lahtonen
• commutative subgroup of S_n, Fedor
  • Re: commutative subgroup of S_n, Robert Israel
    • Re: commutative subgroup of S_n, Fedor
    • Re: commutative subgroup of S_n,
      • Re: commutative subgroup of S_n, Fedor
      • Re: commutative subgroup of S_n, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: commutative subgroup of S_n, Fedor
• Ranked Probability Skill Score problem, KingKong
• counting measure, hagada
  • Re: counting measure, Fedor
• Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, Dan
  • Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, aucun
  • Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, aucun
    • Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, aucun
  • Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, aucun
  • Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, Dan
    • Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, nonono
  • Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, Dan
  • Re: Is the search for the next Fermat prime a false premise?, Dan
• report forduty, Grothendieck
• Ideals of Products, Jose Capco
  • Re: Ideals of Products, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Ideals of Products, barr
      • Re: Ideals of Products, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Ideals of Products, Jose Capco
      • Re: Ideals of Products, Jose Capco
      • Re: Ideals of Products, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: Ideals of Products, Jose Capco
• convexity criteria for ODE solutions, maciej . swat
  • Re: convexity criteria for ODE solutions, Robert Israel
• Abstract fields - clarification, Guy Corrigall
  • Re: Abstract fields - clarification, Hagen
    • Re: Abstract fields - clarification, aucun
      • Re: Abstract fields - clarification, A N Niel
• 1+2+3+....., mina_world
  • Re: 1+2+3+....., rrahulprasad
    • Re: 1+2+3+....., gwlucky
      • Re: 1+2+3+....., gwlucky
      • Re: 1+2+3+....., Robert Israel
      • Re: 1+2+3+....., gwlucky
      • Re: 1+2+3+....., Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: 1+2+3+....., gwlucky
      • Re: 1+2+3+....., David R Tribble
    • Re: 1+2+3+....., Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: 1+2+3+....., HallsofIvy
    • Re: 1+2+3+....., Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • Re: 1+2+3+....., abe . buckingham
    • Re: 1+2+3+....., David W . Cantrell
      • Re: 1+2+3+....., G. A. Edgar
    • Re: 1+2+3+....., Rob Johnson
      • Re: 1+2+3+....., abe . buckingham
  • Message not available
    • Re: 1+2+3+....., Rob Johnson
      • Message not available
      • Re: 1+2+3+....., Rob Johnson
  • Re: 1+2+3+....., Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: 1+2+3+....., jhding@xxxxxxx
• Algebraic number theory, rodolphe . lampe
• one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium
  • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, ldb
    • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, a_plutonium
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes
      • Re: one page proof of 4 Color Mapping, Proginoskes
• Probability and Group Theory, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: Probability and Group Theory, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: Probability and Group Theory, ArtflDodgr
  • Re: Probability and Group Theory, Virgil
    • Re: Probability and Group Theory, cbrown
• picture for Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium
  • Re: picture for Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Narasimham
  • Re: picture for Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, Proginoskes
  • Re: picture for Riem geom + Loba geom = Eucl geom, a_plutonium
• How to prove such an inequality?, jing . hu
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • How to prove such an inequality?, jing . hu
  • How to prove such an inequality?, jing . hu
    • Re: How to prove such an inequality?, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: How to prove such an inequality?, Alois Steindl
      • Re: How to prove such an inequality?, Grothendieck
      • Re: How to prove such an inequality?, jing . hu
      • Re: How to prove such an inequality?, jing . hu
      • Re: How to prove such an inequality?, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: How to prove such an inequality?, Ronald Bruck
• General Nonsense, Jules
  • Re: General Nonsense, fishfry
    • Re: General Nonsense, Herman Jurjus
      • Re: General Nonsense, A N Niel
    • Re: General Nonsense, Jules
      • Re: General Nonsense, Christopher J. Henrich
      • Re: General Nonsense, Marc Olschok
      • Re: General Nonsense, Robert Israel
      • Re: General Nonsense, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: General Nonsense, john_ramsden
  • Re: General Nonsense, Robert Low
  • Re: General Nonsense, Phil Carmody
  • Re: General Nonsense, martin cohen
• order of an element, alihandam@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: order of an element, Fedor
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • order of an element, alihandam@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: order of an element, Ulysse Keller
    • Re: order of an element, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: order of an element, alihandam@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: order of an element, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: order of an element,
      • Re: order of an element, Chip Eastham
      • Re: order of an element,
• summations series references, ramakrishnan . kannan
  • Re: summations series references, A N Niel
  • Re: summations series references, martin cohen
• Perception and Simulation of Intelligent Bahaviour Research Group, yansh
• set functions, quat
  • Re: set functions, Ronald Bruck
  • Re: set functions, William Elliot
• OT: News about Lynn Killingbeck., billyv1988@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: OT: News about Lynn Killingbeck., [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: OT: News about Lynn Killingbeck., Robert Israel
  • Re: OT: News about Lynn Killingbeck., Phil Carmody
• reflection preserves surface area, Sean McIlroy
  • Re: reflection preserves surface area, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: reflection preserves surface area, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• Re: derivative of arctan(tan(x)), sd1
  • Re: derivative of arctan(tan(x)), [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: derivative of arctan(tan(x)), sd1
    • Re: derivative of arctan(tan(x)), Zdislav V. Kovarik
• groups, automorphisms and isomorphisms, conchitagutierres
  • Re: groups, automorphisms and isomorphisms, Robert Israel
    • Re: groups, automorphisms and isomorphisms, conchitagutierres
      • Re: groups, automorphisms and isomorphisms, Robert Israel
• Chain-Complete Posets, bbmcmung
  • Re: Chain-Complete Posets, bbmcmung
• Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, Karel Bruneel
  • Re: Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, gwlucky
  • Re: Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, Narcoleptic Insomniac
    • Re: Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, Karel Bruneel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, Karel Bruneel
    • Re: Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, Keith A. Lewis
      • Re: Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, Karel Bruneel
      • Re: Mapping a square grid to a rectangular grid, Keith A. Lewis
• Re: Help with proving the directional derivative, jpawloski
• system of linear algebraic equation solvability, Sergiy M.Zhuk
  • Re: system of linear algebraic equation solvability, Jannick Asmus
• Kripke's inductive partial self-applicable truth predicate, Aatu Koskensilta
• Parabolic subgroups, Grothendieck-Hirzebruch
• Approximating an expectation term, Vicki
• local homeomorphism, Simeon Stefanov
• Does this series converge?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Does this series converge?, Ronald Bruck
    • Message not available
      • Re: Does this series converge?, Rob Johnson
  • Re: Does this series converge?, The World Wide Wade
• Cryptanalysis, Falwe R
  • Re: Cryptanalysis, Ken Pledger
    • Re: Cryptanalysis, stern
      • Re: Cryptanalysis, Phil Carmody
    • Re: Cryptanalysis, Falwe R
      • Re: Cryptanalysis, Ken Pledger
    • Re: Cryptanalysis, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Cryptanalysis, stern
  • Re: Cryptanalysis, Pubkeybreaker
• Multidimensional Modular Arithmetic, tontoko
  • Re: Multidimensional Modular Arithmetic, Virgil
• Coins on a Lazy Susan, stern
  • Re: Coins on a Lazy Susan, Robert Israel
    • Re: Coins on a Lazy Susan, Falwe R
    • Re: Coins on a Lazy Susan, stern
      • Re: Coins on a Lazy Susan, Robert Israel
      • Re: Coins on a Lazy Susan, stern
      • Re: Coins on a Lazy Susan, Robert Israel
      • Re: Coins on a Lazy Susan, stern
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Coins on a Lazy Susan, enigma
• Re: What will happen, José Carlos Santos
• A perfect number question regarding the Colatz conjecture!, Dan
  • Re: A perfect number question regarding the Colatz conjecture!, Fermat
• negative notation, sizors_1
  • Re: negative notation, William Elliot
• Re: Real Tetration Solution, Andrew Robbins
• Prove something on The determinant of Matrix, donkey
  • Re: Prove something on The determinant of Matrix, Michael Varney
  • Re: Prove something on The determinant of Matrix, Ken Pledger
• 2D equi distant points around circle onto around 3D sphere, guitar . is . good
  • Re: 2D equi distant points around circle onto around 3D sphere, Sylvain Croussette
    • Re: 2D equi distant points around circle onto around 3D sphere, guitar . is . good
• Open and not open sets in R^2, S.M.
  • Re: Open and not open sets in R^2, Russell
  • Re: Open and not open sets in R^2, singau
    • Re: Open and not open sets in R^2, W. Dale Hall
      • Re: Open and not open sets in R^2, Rob
      • Re: Open and not open sets in R^2, Russell
      • Re: Open and not open sets in R^2, Rob
• complex root at extremum, Narasimham
  • Re: complex root at extremum, Robert Israel
    • Re: complex root at extremum, Narasimham
      • Re: complex root at extremum, Robert Israel
      • Re: complex root at extremum, Narasimham
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: complex root at extremum, Narasimham
• L^2 always complete ?, Fedor
  • Re: L^2 always complete ?, Robert Israel
• fractional index polynomial, Narasimham
  • Re: fractional index polynomial, Ben Luden
  • Re: fractional index polynomial, Robert Israel
• Gaussian Probablity function, robison
  • Re: Gaussian Probablity function, gwlucky
  • Re: Gaussian Probablity function, Schizoid Man
  • Re: Gaussian Probablity function, Schizoid Man
  • Re: Gaussian Probablity function, iandjmsmith
• advice for transfering grad student, Andrew Cousino
  • Re: advice for transfering grad student, Ben Luden
    • Re: advice for transfering grad student, gwlucky
      • Re: advice for transfering grad student, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: advice for transfering grad student, gwlucky
• [Announcement] Check out blog on history of Fermat's Last Theorem, larry.freeman@xxxxxxxxx
• whether the space is complete, eugene
  • Re: whether the space is complete, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: whether the space is complete, David C. Ullrich
      • Re: whether the space is complete, eugene
      • Re: whether the space is complete, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: whether the space is complete, David C . Ullrich
• figuring out a checksum method, Chris W
  • Re: figuring out a checksum method, Ben Luden
    • Re: figuring out a checksum method, Chris W
      • Re: figuring out a checksum method, Ben Luden
      • Re: figuring out a checksum method, Chris W
  • Re: figuring out a checksum method, Mkajuma
• complete set, quat
  • Re: complete set, José Carlos Santos
• probability question, Mkajuma
  • Re: probability question, gwlucky
    • Re: probability question, Mkajuma
      • Re: probability question, Ben Luden
      • Re: probability question, Mkajuma
      • Re: probability question, Ben Luden
      • Re: probability question, briggs
      • Re: probability question, Ben Luden
      • Re: probability question, Randy Poe
      • Re: probability question, Ben Luden
      • Re: probability question, Randy Poe
      • Re: probability question, gwlucky
      • Re: probability question, Robert Israel
  • Re: probability question, Randy Poe
    • Re: probability question, Rod
      • Re: probability question, Randy Poe
  • Re: probability question, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: probability question, The Qurqirish Dragon
    • Re: probability question, Mkajuma
      • Re: probability question, Frank Ferrese
      • Re: probability question, Randy Poe
      • Re: probability question, Frank Ferrese
  • Re: probability question, Rod
    • Re: probability question, The Qurqirish Dragon
      • Re: probability question, briggs
• JSH is a virgin microbe that penetrates with the insistence of air into all the spaces that reason has not been able to fill with words or conventions., Ben Luden
• uniform convergence?, damage
  • Re: uniform convergence?, A N Niel
  • Re: uniform convergence?, mskirvin
• Help me please, thank you very much!, Jack
  • Re: Help me please, thank you very much!, gwlucky
• Re: How to programmatically plot a function?, Raymond Toy
  • Re: How to programmatically plot a function?, Dave Rusin
    • Re: How to programmatically plot a function?, Raymond Toy
• New naive roots solving algorithms, arithmonic
• ? solving A*X = B with measurement errors, Cheng Cosine
• Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Austin Pass
  • Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, William Elliot
    • Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, William Elliot
      • Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, William Elliot
      • Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, William Elliot
      • Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Proginoskes
      • Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Dave Seaman
  • Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, gerben47
    • Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, a1jrj@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Randy Poe
    • Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Randy Poe
  • Message not available
    • Re: Humiliated by a student's question - help!, Rob Johnson
• open questions in linear algebra, Michael
  • Re: open questions in linear algebra, Hagen
  • Re: open questions in linear algebra, Michael
  • Re: open questions in linear algebra, lataianu bogdan
• a prime number question, gilevgi
  • Re: a prime number question, Eric J. Wingler
    • Re: a prime number question, Robert Israel
      • Re: a prime number question, Eric J. Wingler
      • Re: a prime number question, Gottfried Helms
      • Re: a prime number question, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: a prime number question, gwlucky
      • Re: a prime number question, Phil Carmody
      • Re: a prime number question, Fermat
      • Re: a prime number question, Rob Johnson
      • Re: a prime number question, aucun
  • Re: a prime number question, Phil Carmody
• functions of bounded variation, Simone
  • Re: functions of bounded variation, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: functions of bounded variation, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: functions of bounded variation, The World Wide Wade
• Terminology problem, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
• Simple probability problem, tarjanrobert1234
  • Re: Simple probability problem, Robert May
  • Re: Simple probability problem, Randy Poe
• derivation of mean, binomial distribution, robison
  • Message not available
    • Re: derivation of mean, binomial distribution, Rob Johnson
  • Re: derivation of mean, binomial distribution, Robert Israel
• JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Larry Lard
    • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Gib Bogle
  • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Virgil
  • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Michael Varney
  • Re: Keep it simple, Vin Mariani
  • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, abe . buckingham
    • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Michael Varney
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, abe . buckingham
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, abe . buckingham
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Michael Varney
  • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Justin
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rupert
  • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rupert
    • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rick Decker
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rupert
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rick Decker
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rupert
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rupert
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rupert
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Rupert
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, William Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, William Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, William Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, William Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, William Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, William Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, John Roberts-Jones
      • Re: JSH: Keep it simple, Proginoskes
• Triangle # prime sieve revisited with an answer to a previous question!, Dan
  • Re: Triangle # prime sieve revisited:Making claim to another discovery!, Dan
• cholesky conjugated gradient method, bowo
  • Re: cholesky conjugated gradient method, Victor Eijkhout
  • Re: cholesky conjugated gradient method, will
• Applied mathmatics - straight line eq's + points, BigAl . NZ
  • Re: Applied mathmatics - straight line eq's + points, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• proof of validity and proving, yakuza
  • Re: proof of validity and proving, Robert Israel
• Snell's Law and Fermat's Principle, sstrad
  • Re: Snell's Law and Fermat's Principle, gwlucky
  • Re: Snell's Law and Fermat's Principle, Narasimham
• Question about partial order, agapito6314
  • Re: Question about partial order, William Elliot
  • Re: Question about partial order, matthias
  • Re: Question about partial order, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Question about partial order, Ken Pledger
      • Re: Question about partial order, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Question about partial order, Marc Olschok
    • Re: Question about partial order, agapito6314
      • Re: Question about partial order, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question about partial order, agapito6314
      • Re: Question about partial order, William Elliot
      • Re: Question about partial order, A N Niel
• JSH: Facts don't lie, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Facts don't lie, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Facts don't lie, Jn
    • Re: Facts don't lie, jstevh
  • Re: Facts don't lie, David Moran
  • Re: JSH: Facts don't lie, Victor Eijkhout
    • Re: JSH: Facts don't lie, Michael Varney
  • Re: JSH: Facts don't lie, Virgil
  • Re: JSH: Facts don't lie, Michael Varney
  • Re: JSH: Facts don't lie, Wayne Brown
• Numerical approximation for Student's t, Schizoid Man
• rsa number theory, Michael Harrington
  • Re: rsa number theory, Jules
    • Re: rsa number theory, Michael Harrington
• Re: Literacy, Mike Kent
• Exotic examples please, Kenneth Bull
  • Re: Exotic examples please, matthias
    • Re: Exotic examples please, Proginoskes
      • Re: Exotic examples please, Kenneth Bull
      • Re: Exotic examples please / re: local extremes, James Waldby
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• U = C/X, pdf f_X(x) is known, and C is a constant, whats f_U(u)?, kunliu1
• Draft Order, tleveck
  • Re: Draft Order, cbrown
    • Re: Draft Order, Don Reble
      • Re: Draft Order, cbrown
      • Re: Draft Order, Duncan Muirhead
• algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Ujjaval
  • Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Proginoskes
      • Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Proginoskes
  • Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Erik Naggum
  • Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Jn
    • Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Ujjaval
      • Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Ed Hook
      • Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Keith A. Lewis
      • Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, James Waldby
      • Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its, Keith A. Lewis
      • Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its, James Waldby
  • Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, john_ramsden
  • Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: algorithm to identify number from 0-16384 having at most 4 1s in its binary number, Proginoskes
• fourier series, figurt
  • Re: fourier series, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: fourier series, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: fourier series, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: fourier series, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: fourier series, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: fourier series, David C . Ullrich
• graph layout algorithm, enigma261
  • Re: graph layout algorithm, gwlucky
  • Re: graph layout algorithm, Doni Ocena
• Summation, modulo and decimal, spin9
  • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Tim Peters
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Tim Peters
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, B. Spin
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Summation, modulo and decimal, Tim Peters
• Permutations, confusion about notation, robison
  • Re: Permutations, confusion about notation, Randy Poe
  • Re: Permutations, confusion about notation, Arturo Magidin
• fourier analysis, Tom Banks
  • Re: fourier analysis, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: fourier analysis, Tom Banks
      • Re: fourier analysis, The World Wide Wade
• Which integral domains have gcds?, Dan Cass
  • Re: Which integral domains have gcds?, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Which integral domains have gcds?, Bill Dubuque
• stationary source - definition, computer
• Method of finding solutions using squared derivatives, draccarlawpet
  • Re: Method of finding solutions using squared derivatives, Jules
• Coupled PDEs, cfd101
  • Re: Coupled PDEs, nir cohen
    • Re: Coupled PDEs, kunaldcet
  • Message not available
    • Re: Coupled PDEs, kunaldcet
• Show that resolvent operator L ..., zetafunction
  • Re: Show that resolvent operator L ..., Robert Israel
    • Re: Show that resolvent operator L ..., zetafunction
  • Re: Show that ... (changed directory), zetafunction
• Help with this serie : U(m+n) = U(n), fox-35@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Help with this serie : U(m+n) = U(n), Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: Help with this serie : U(m+n) = U(n), alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help with this serie : U(m+n) = U(n), TEZUELLA
      • Re: Help with this serie : U(m+n) = U(n), Robert Israel
      • Re: Help with this serie : U(m+n) = U(n), TEZUELLA
      • Re: Help with this serie : U(m+n) = U(n), Keith A. Lewis
• New "naive" and so "simple" roots solving algorithms, arithmetic
• almost periodic functions, Marko Lindner
  • Re: almost periodic functions, David C . Ullrich
• integrating SQRT[A*sin(w*x) + B*cos(w*x)+C], Ilik
  • Re: integrating SQRT[A*sin(w*x) + B*cos(w*x)+C], Robert Israel
• help: How do I find the exact postion of a cell when converted from 3D to 1 D?, news.dyson
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: help: How do I find the exact postion of a cell when converted from 3D to 1 D?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: help: How do I find the exact postion of a cell when converted from 3D to 1 D?, gnh888
      • Re: help: How do I find the exact postion of a cell when converted from 3D to 1 D?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: help: How do I find the exact postion of a cell when converted from 3D to 1 D?, gnh888@xxxxxxxxx
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 23, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Thermodynamics based on the Hahn-Banach theorem., phbouafia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Thermodynamics based on the Hahn-Banach theorem., A N Niel
• Q is not a G_delta set, eugene
  • Re: Q is not a G_delta set, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Q is not a G_delta set, smn
  • Re: Q is not a G_delta set, William Elliot
• Will anyone do me a favor to tell me where can I find books/papers about lattice/hyperlattice/superlattice?, yumingfeng25928
• Integration Problem involving 'e', REJNAL
  • Re: Integration Problem involving 'e', Jn
    • Re: Integration Problem involving 'e', REJNAL
  • Message not available
    • Re: Integration Problem involving 'e', Rob Johnson
      • Re: Integration Problem involving 'e', REJNAL
• Many Worlds Probability Problem, rev.goetz
  • Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, Jn
  • Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, stephen
  • Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, John Bailey
    • Re: Many Worlds Probability Problem, rev.goetz
• property for subgroup of GLn, dyaniv2
  • Re: property for subgroup of GLn, dyaniv2
  • Re: property for subgroup of GLn, gwlucky
    • Re: property for subgroup of GLn, dyaniv2
      • Re: property for subgroup of GLn, gwlucky
  • Re: property for subgroup of GLn, Robert Israel
    • Re: property for subgroup of GLn, dyaniv2
      • Re: property for subgroup of GLn, José Carlos Santos
• JSH: Communication breakdown, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Communication breakdown, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Communication breakdown, Jn
    • Re: Communication breakdown, fishfry
      • Re: Communication breakdown, Jn
      • Re: Communication breakdown, Wayne Brown
      • Re: Communication breakdown, Proginoskes
      • Re: Communication breakdown, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Communication breakdown, Tim Peters
      • Re: Communication breakdown, Richard Henry
      • Re: Communication breakdown, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Communication breakdown, Wayne Brown
      • Re: Communication breakdown, KeithK
      • Re: Communication breakdown, Tim Peters
  • Re: Communication breakdown, David Moran
  • Re: JSH: Communication breakdown, Michael Varney
  • Re: JSH: Communication breakdown, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: JSH: Communication breakdown, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: Communication breakdown, Rupert
• What does this symbol from Maxwell's equations mean?, JeffS
  • Re: What does this symbol from Maxwell's equations mean?, Larry Lard
    • Re: What does this symbol from Maxwell's equations mean?, JeffS
      • Re: What does this symbol from Maxwell's equations mean?, Randy Poe
• JSH: Power of prediction, jstevh
  • Re: Power of prediction, Jn
  • Re: Power of prediction, Richard Henry
  • Re: JSH: Power of prediction, David C . Ullrich
• Cross Products, John
  • Re: Cross Products, john
  • Re: Cross Products, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Cross Products, John
      • Re: Cross Products- and quaternions, JEMebius
      • Re: Cross Products, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Cross Products, John
  • Re: Cross Products, Jim Heckman
  • Re: Cross Products, Michael Varney
• B-spline base, Feniks
• Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Jeffrey Rolland
  • Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Watson Ladd
    • Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Jeffrey Rolland
  • Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Peter Allen
  • Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Proginoskes
    • Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Jeffrey Rolland
    • Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Jeffrey Rolland
      • Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Watson Ladd
      • Re: Finding the Queen of Diamonds in Soltaire, Jeffrey Rolland
• Multiplication Station (OpenSource), ccosse
• Available: Fractals: The Colors Of Infinity VHS video, Fine Used Books
• Monge shuffle relation, alessandra_cabrini
  • Message not available
    • Re: Monge shuffle relation, alessandra_cabrini
      • Re: Monge shuffle relation, alessandra_cabrini
• Flow as exponential of a differential operator, LordBeotian
• how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, John Smith
  • Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, John Smith
      • Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, rip pelletier
      • Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, Don Taylor
  • Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, Proginoskes
    • Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, Dave Seaman
      • Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, Proginoskes
      • Re: how to define a constant in mathematica like Pi, Dave Seaman
• Statisitcal Change in Viewing Area between Powers of a Microscope, vumpler
  • Re: Statisitcal Change in Viewing Area between Powers of a Microscope, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: Statisitcal Change in Viewing Area between Powers of a Microscope, vumpler
• Digits of e, C W
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Digits of e, C W
• Help with this proof., R. Colacitti
  • Re: Help with this proof., Rouben Rostamian
    • Re: Help with this proof., R. Colacitti
      • Re: Help with this proof., gwlucky
      • Re: Help with this proof., Rouben Rostamian
      • Re: Help with this proof., Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: Help with this proof., gwlucky
      • Re: Help with this proof., R. Colacitti
      • Re: Help with this proof., gwlucky
  • Message not available
    • Re: Help with this proof., Rob Johnson
• Need help with proof for ordered fields, dchris
  • Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, Coopoo . Chiou
  • Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, Ron Sperber
  • Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, dchris
    • Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, Dan Christensen
      • Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, Dan Christensen
  • Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, will
    • Re: Need help with proof for ordered fields, dchris
• delta function, tenida@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: delta function, Robert Israel
    • Re: delta function, Toni Lassila
      • Re: delta function, Robert Israel
      • Re: delta function, tenida@xxxxxxxxx
• Can someone explain this Heisenburg quote on Schrodingers equation, geffen
  • Re: Can someone explain this Heisenburg quote on Schrodingers equation, nightlight
• Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, gd1956
  • Re: Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, Michael Harrington
    • Re: Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, gd1956
      • Re: Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, gwlucky
      • Re: Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, Randy Poe
      • Re: Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, gd1956
  • Message not available
    • Re: Real-time Calculation of Standard Deviation, Rob Johnson
• An infinite number question, rev.goetz
  • Re: An infinite number question, Rouben Rostamian
  • Re: An infinite number question, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: An infinite number question, Rob
    • Re: An infinite number question, rev.goetz
      • Re: An infinite number question, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: An infinite number question, rev.goetz
      • Re: An infinite number question, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: An infinite number question, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: An infinite number question, rev.goetz
      • Re: An infinite number question, gwlucky
      • Re: An infinite number question, Robert Low
      • Re: An infinite number question, gwlucky
      • Re: An infinite number question, gwlucky
    • Re: An infinite number question, Proginoskes
  • Re: An infinite number question, Jn
    • Re: An infinite number question, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: An infinite number question, gd1956
  • Re: An infinite number question, William Elliot
  • Re: An infinite number question, Phil Carmody
    • Re: An infinite number question, rev.goetz
      • Re: An infinite number question, Robert Israel
      • Re: An infinite number question, rev.goetz
      • Re: An infinite number question, Robert Israel
      • Re: An infinite number question, Phil Carmody
  • Re: An infinite number question, bill
• Subject Selection Query, riku
  • Re: Subject Selection Query, Ken Pledger
  • Re: Subject Selection Query, Gerry Myerson
• Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Roman B. Binder
    • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Rick Decker
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Rick Decker
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Dave Rusin
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Rick Decker
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Dave Rusin
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Arturo Magidin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Doug
  • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, David Moran
  • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Gib Bogle
  • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Bill Dubuque
    • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Rick Decker
    • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, jstevh
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Proginoskes
      • Message not available
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, jstevh
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, jstevh
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Virgil
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Christopher J. Henrich
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Rick Decker
  • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Rick Decker
    • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, jstevh
  • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Tim Peters
    • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, David C . Ullrich
    • Message not available
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, José Carlos Santos
    • Message not available
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Tim Peters
      • Message not available
      • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Tim Peters
  • Re: Brutal result, actually unanswerable, Eric Gisse
• Notation for Inverse Propotionality?, dougwedel
  • Re: Notation for Inverse Propotionality?, gwlucky
  • Re: Notation for Inverse Propotionality?, gwlucky
• is f' continuous on this interval, Kobu
  • Re: is f' continuous on this interval, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: is f' continuous on this interval, Kenneth Bull
    • Message not available
      • Re: is f' continuous on this interval, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: is f' continuous on this interval, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: is f' continuous on this interval, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: is f' continuous on this interval, Kenneth Bull
      • Re: is f' continuous on this interval, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: is f' continuous on this interval, Kenneth Bull
    • Re: is f' continuous on this interval, Ted Hwa
      • Re: is f' continuous on this interval, A Aitken
      • Re: is f' continuous on this interval, Dave Seaman
      • Re: is f' continuous on this interval, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: is f' continuous on this interval, A Aitken
      • Re: is f' continuous on this interval, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: is f' continuous on this interval, A Aitken
• A question about Probable Primes, Marc Bogaerts
  • Re: A question about Probable Primes, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: A question about Probable Primes, Marc Bogaerts
      • Re: A question about Probable Primes, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: A question about Probable Primes, Phil Carmody
      • Re: A question about Probable Primes, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: A question about Probable Primes, Phil Carmody
• Re: Modification of Mostowski Collapsing Theorem, Dennis May
• Simple Graphing, jclause
  • Re: Simple Graphing, Phil Holman
    • Re: Simple Graphing, jclause
• Will anyone do me a favor to tell me where can I download some books about hyperlattice/lattice?, yumingfeng25928
  • Re: Will anyone do me a favor to tell me where can I download some books about hyperlattice/lattice?, john_ramsden
    • Re: Will anyone do me a favor to tell me where can I download some books about hyperlattice/lattice?, yumingfeng25928
• Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, José Carlos Santos
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Doug
    • Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Proginoskes
      • Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Wayne Brown
  • Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Tim Peters
  • Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Proginoskes
  • Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Gib Bogle
  • Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Rick Decker
  • Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Rick Decker
    • Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, jstevh
      • Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Rick Decker
      • Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Tim Peters
      • Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Proginoskes
      • Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Proof of fraud, flawed number theory still taught, Michael
• sup{(B'z,f)|f\in G}, Sergiy M.Zhuk
  • Re: sup{(B'z,f)|f\in G}, Jannick Asmus
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: sup{(B'z,f)|f\in G}, Sergiy M.Zhuk
• if f is continuos then f(cl(A)) is a subset of cl(f(A)) ?, Jonas
  • Re: if f is continuos then f(cl(A)) is a subset of cl(f(A)) ?, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: if f is continuos then f(cl(A)) is a subset of cl(f(A)) ?, Spamless
  • Re: if f is continuos then f(cl(A)) is a subset of cl(f(A)) ?, William Elliot
• skew symmetric map/comples geometry, singau
  • Re: skew symmetric map/comples geometry, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: skew symmetric map/comples geometry, singau
      • Re: skew symmetric map/comples geometry, Jannick Asmus
• Interesting period oscillations in Goldbach comet, WL
• Mathematical Model for Transmission, Jeremy
  • Re: Mathematical Model for Transmission, Jeremy Boden
  • Re: Mathematical Model for Transmission, Andy Spragg
    • Re: Mathematical Model for Transmission, Jeremy
• How this algorithm of prime factor decomposition works?, rickyzhang
  • Re: How this algorithm of prime factor decomposition works?, Rob Johnson
  • Re: How this algorithm of prime factor decomposition works?, Keith A. Lewis
• The distribution of the minimum distance to the center of an hypersphere, Lior
  • Message not available
    • Re: The distribution of the minimum distance to the center of an hypersphere, Rob Johnson
• An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Jim Heckman
    • Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Jim Heckman
      • Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Jim Heckman
      • Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Jim Heckman
    • Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Jim Heckman
      • Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Jim Heckman
  • Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Christopher J. Henrich
    • Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Jim Heckman
      • Re: An error in Coxeter's regular polytopes?, Christopher J. Henrich
• Recursion, Tom
  • Re: Recursion, Robert Israel
• Human Robot Following Using Parco UWB RFID Tags and Obstacle Detection, kartoun
• list of universities math deps. specializing in mathematical logic?, mozert1
  • Re: list of universities math deps. specializing in mathematical logic?, way_too_scattered
    • Re: list of universities math deps. specializing in mathematical logic?, way_too_scattered
  • Re: list of universities math deps. specializing in mathematical logic?, MoeBlee
  • Re: list of universities math deps. specializing in mathematical logic?, mozert1
• More Math Books for sale, dgiaimo
• A class of optimization problems involving supply and demand, DrJones
• Matrix equation: Solve for subset of X in Ax=B, pierrelap
  • Re: Matrix equation: Solve for subset of X in Ax=B, Randy Poe
    • Re: Matrix equation: Solve for subset of X in Ax=B, pierrelap
• IID RV P(X_A<X_B), Intiha
  • Re: IID RV P(X_A<X_B), Randy Poe
    • Re: IID RV P(X_A<X_B), Toni Lassila
• Minimizing Eigenvector, hurricane
  • Re: Minimizing Eigenvector, Michael Varney
• if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Jonas
  • Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Robert Low
    • Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Jonas
      • Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Robert Low
  • Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Rob Johnson
      • Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: if f^-1(A) is a subset of f^-1(B) then A is a subset of B?, Ronald Bruck
• What is a Borel set?, Konrad Viltersten
  • Re: What is a Borel set?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: What is a Borel set?, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: What is a Borel set?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is a Borel set?, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: What is a Borel set?, Jules
• Singular value decomposition, xargon
  • Re: Singular value decomposition, Robert Low
    • Re: Singular value decomposition, gwlucky
  • Re: Singular value decomposition, Virgil
• finding the love of your life, willrichie
• list of semigroups, Genaro Juarez Martinez
  • Re: list of semigroups, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: list of semigroups, Robert Israel
  • Re: list of semigroups, stush
• Pleausantly Pharamga cy, "Asma Drysdale"
• a framework for sculpting a theory T, MoeBlee
• exponent laws for unknown base, known exponents, True Raptor
  • Re: exponent laws for unknown base, known exponents, Robert Israel
• ODE books without differential treatment?, G Patel
  • Re: ODE books without differential treatment?, Robert Israel
  • Re: ODE books without differential treatment?, Russell
  • Message not available
    • Re: ODE books without differential treatment?, G Patel
      • Re: ODE books without differential treatment?, Russell
      • Re: ODE books without differential treatment?, john_ramsden
  • Re: ODE books without differential treatment?, Rouben Rostamian
• Is there a twice differentiable function, agentmath
  • Re: Is there a twice differentiable function, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Is there a twice differentiable function, agentmath
• Toeplitz Matrix, Naebad
  • Re: Toeplitz Matrix, Carlos Moreno
    • Re: Toeplitz Matrix, Naebad
  • Re: Toeplitz Matrix, Richard Harter
    • Re: Toeplitz Matrix, Naebad
      • Re: Toeplitz Matrix, Richard Harter
      • Re: Toeplitz Matrix, Naebad
      • Re: Toeplitz Matrix, Robert Israel
  • Re: Toeplitz Matrix, carlos
    • Re: Toeplitz Matrix, Naebad
      • Re: Toeplitz Matrix, carlos
• Re: Creationist Mathematics, Proginoskes
• Quadratic extensions and squares, Julien Santini
  • Re: Quadratic extensions and squares, Julien Santini
  • Re: Quadratic extensions and squares, Julien Santini
    • Re: Quadratic extensions and squares, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Quadratic extensions and squares, Bill Dubuque
• Transformation Matrix, Skib
  • Re: Transformation Matrix, Dave Rusin
    • Re: Transformation Matrix, Skib
      • Re: Transformation Matrix, Skib
• Conjecture about measure, Jules
  • Re: Conjecture about measure, José Carlos Santos
• Lagrange Expansion, Mark Robinton
  • Re: Lagrange Expansion, Ronald Bruck
    • Re: Lagrange Expansion, Mark Robinton
      • Re: Lagrange Expansion, Robert Israel
      • Re: Lagrange Expansion, Mark Robinton
      • Re: Lagrange Expansion, Robert Israel
• Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, David Moran
    • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Bleem Bleom
  • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Robert Israel
  • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Rouben Rostamian
    • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, A Aitken
      • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Randy Poe
    • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Ronald Bruck
      • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Rouben Rostamian
      • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Randy Poe
      • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Robert Israel
      • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Ronald Bruck
  • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, mhill37
  • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Zdislav V. Kovarik
    • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, martin cohen
    • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Regarding tan(x) = x, Dave L. Renfro
• Continuity of inverse function, Albert
  • Re: Continuity of inverse function, gwlucky
    • Re: Continuity of inverse function, Albert
    • Re: Continuity of inverse function, Albert
      • Re: Continuity of inverse function, Ronald Bruck
      • Re: Continuity of inverse function, Albert
      • Re: Continuity of inverse function, Robert Israel
      • Re: Continuity of inverse function, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Continuity of inverse function, Albert
      • Re: Continuity of inverse function, Albert
• Ergodic theorem for groups?, Dan
• graph has zero area, quat
  • Re: graph has zero area, Jules
    • Re: graph has zero area, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: graph has zero area, Jules
      • Re: graph has zero area, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: graph has zero area, Jules
      • Re: graph has zero area, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: graph has zero area, Robert Israel
      • Re: graph has zero area, Dave L. Renfro
• f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, dawenliu
  • Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, Frank Ferrese
  • Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, Chip Eastham
  • Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, Russell
  • Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, Peter L. Montgomery
      • Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, dawenliu
      • Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: f(x|x<3), how do we read this in English?, David C . Ullrich
• 3M, Narasimham
  • Re: 3M, Jaap Spies
    • Re: 3M, Frank Ferrese
  • Re: 3M, Robert Israel
    • Re: 3M, Robert Israel
• Computationally Representing Vernier, Jeffrey Drake
• Renormalization revisited, WG
  • Re: Renormalization revisited, WG
  • Re: Renormalization revisited, WG
• complete metric space, Derek
  • Re: complete metric space, Daniel Grubb
• Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, draccarlawpet
  • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Frank Ferrese
  • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, gwlucky
    • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, gwlucky
      • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, carlos
    • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, draccarlawpet
      • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, carlos
      • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, draccarlawpet
  • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, abe . buckingham
  • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Ken Pledger
  • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Proginoskes
  • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, gwlucky
  • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, way_too_scattered
  • Re: Greatest Math Accomplishment Past 30 years or so, Mike Kent
• MATLAB Command, Frank Ferrese
  • Re: MATLAB Command, Randy Poe
    • Re: MATLAB Command, Frank Ferrese
      • Re: MATLAB Command, jjbuchholz
      • Re: MATLAB Command, W. Dale Hall
• WLAN and Light Dimmers - Off Topic, gwlucky
  • Re: WLAN and Light Dimmers - Off Topic, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: WLAN and Light Dimmers - Off Topic, gwlucky
• Lebesgue density theorem, Alex
  • Re: Lebesgue density theorem, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Lebesgue density theorem, Alexanderz
      • Re: Lebesgue density theorem, David C. Ullrich
  • Re: Lebesgue density theorem, Julian Aguirre
• Points that are clopen!, Jose Capco
  • Re: Points that are clopen!, John Coleman
    • Re: Points that are clopen!, Jose Capco
  • Re: Points that are clopen!, William Elliot
    • Re: Points that are clopen!, way_too_scattered
    • Re: Points that are clopen!, Jose Capco
      • Re: Points that are clopen!, William Elliot
• strange...., mina_world
  • Re: strange...., Joseph Fagan
    • Re: strange...., mina_world
      • Re: strange...., Keith A. Lewis
      • Re: strange...., mina_world
      • Re: strange...., mina_world
• complex derivative ?, Lin. S.
  • Re: complex derivative ?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: complex derivative ?, Lin. S.
• When two variables are proportional ..., Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
  • Re: When two variables are proportional ..., Joseph Fagan
• { }, zuhair
  • Re: { }, leo1476
    • Re: { }, zuhair
      • Re: { }, David R Tribble
      • Re: { }, zuhair
      • Re: { }, David R Tribble
      • Re: { }, zuhair
      • Re: { }, zuhair
  • Re: { }, William Elliot
    • Re: { }, John Coleman
      • Re: { }, William Elliot
    • Re: { }, zuhair
      • Re: { }, William Elliot
      • Re: { }, Proginoskes
      • Re: { }, William Elliot
    • Re: { }, Richard Harter
      • Re: { }, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: { }, Richard Harter
      • Re: { }, William Elliot
      • Re: { }, Richard Harter
  • Re: { }, stush
    • Re: { }, zuhair
• Markov Chain Problem, Mubashir
• new paper, Michael
  • Re: new paper, Proginoskes
  • Re: new paper, mathman
  • Re: new paper, Dave L. Renfro
• special linear functions, sonny746
  • Re: special linear functions, Robert Israel
• 4 descent needed, Randall
  • Re: 4 descent needed, Randall
• Real life problem, Paul Goodhew
  • Re: Real life problem, Virgil
  • Re: Real life problem, MoeBlee
  • Re: Real life problem, Dave Rusin
• analysis double integral, quat
  • Re: analysis double integral, William Elliot
    • Re: analysis double integral, David C. Ullrich
      • Re: analysis double integral, William Elliot
  • Re: analysis double integral, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: analysis double integral, quat
      • Re: analysis double integral, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: analysis double integral, quat
      • Re: analysis double integral, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: analysis double integral, quat
      • Re: analysis double integral, The World Wide Wade
• Least Absolute Deviations by Repeated Weighted Least-Squares - HELP!, dontspam
  • Re: Least Absolute Deviations by Repeated Weighted Least-Squares - HELP!, Brian Borchers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Least Absolute Deviations by Repeated Weighted Least-Squares - HELP!, dontspam
• What's my base?, Mike
  • Re: What's my base?, Stephen Merriman
  • Re: What's my base?, Keith A. Lewis
• probability = 1/infinite ?, Roy
  • Re: probability = 1/infinite ?, Robert Israel
    • Re: probability = 1/infinite ?, Roy
      • Re: probability = 1/infinite ?, Robert Israel
      • Re: probability = 1/infinite ?, Roy
      • Re: probability = 1/infinite ?, Roy
      • Re: probability = 1/infinite ?, David C . Ullrich
• Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., David Dathe
  • Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., Ludwig Prozz
  • Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., leo1476
    • Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., gwlucky
      • Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., Frank Ferrese
  • Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., Me
  • Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., sonny746
  • Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., Michael Varney
    • Re: Math Preparation for Physics PhD program., Rod
• Simple question in real analysis, ThickAsABrick
  • Re: Simple question in real analysis, Rupert
  • Re: Simple question in real analysis, Peter L. Montgomery
    • Re: Simple question in real analysis, ThickAsABrick
• "Cartesian Coordinate Systems", i . love . jeevitha
  • Re: "Cartesian Coordinate Systems", shmurray
  • Re: "Cartesian Coordinate Systems", shmurray
    • Re: "Cartesian Coordinate Systems", gwlucky
  • Re: "Cartesian Coordinate Systems", Robert Low
• Tough finite fields theorem: existence of irreducible polynomials, Doug B
  • Re: Tough finite fields theorem: existence of irreducible polynomials, Timothy Murphy
    • Re: Tough finite fields theorem: existence of irreducible polynomials, Doug B
      • Re: Tough finite fields theorem: existence of irreducible polynomials, mskirvin
      • Re: Tough finite fields theorem: existence of irreducible polynomials, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: Tough finite fields theorem: existence of irreducible polynomials, Timothy Murphy
  • Re: Tough finite fields theorem: existence of irreducible polynomials, Bill Dubuque
• Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Gerard Schildberger
  • Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: Efficient algorithm to calculate fractional powers of 2?, Tony Orlow
• topology on finite sets, hagada
  • Re: topology on finite sets, Michael B. Williams
  • Re: topology on finite sets, William Elliot
• Covering space, giovani55
  • Re: Covering space, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: Covering space, giovani55
• [RE] Jan 18, 2006 Shareholder Release, "Delbert Ransom"
• Re: FPOTD # 10, Microwaved Nuts (PIC) 1/18/2006, Clifford J. Nelson
• homework help: relatively prime ideals, HY
  • Re: homework help: relatively prime ideals, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: homework help: relatively prime ideals, Arturo Magidin
• a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, damage
  • Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, Rouben Rostamian
    • Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, damage
      • Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, damage
      • Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, damage
      • Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, Rouben Rostamian
      • Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, damage
      • Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: a function which is an element of L1, but not L2, The World Wide Wade
• origami catenoid, Sean McIlroy
  • Re: origami catenoid, Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: origami catenoid, Sean McIlroy
      • Re: origami catenoid, Narasimham
  • Re: origami catenoid, Narasimham
• Sandwich primes!, Dan
  • Re: Sandwich primes!, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Sandwich primes!, Dan
  • Re: Sandwich primes! Correction!, Dan
    • Re: Sandwich primes! Correction!, Oscar Lanzi III
  • Re: Sandwich primes!, Dan
    • Re: Sandwich primes!, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Sandwich primes!, Dan
• x * 0 = 1, GoToUkraine
  • Re: x * 0 = 1, gwlucky
  • Re: x * 0 = 1, GoToUkraine
    • Re: x * 0 = 1, singau
• I am looking for a differentiable function, agentsolver
  • Re: I am looking for a differentiable function, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: I am looking for a differentiable function, agentsolver
  • Re: I am looking for a differentiable function, David C . Ullrich
• zero of continuous functions, Michael
  • Re: zero of continuous functions, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: zero of continuous functions, Michael
    • Re: zero of continuous functions, David C. Ullrich
    • Re: zero of continuous functions, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: zero of continuous functions, David C. Ullrich
      • Re: zero of continuous functions, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: zero of continuous functions, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: zero of continuous functions, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: zero of continuous functions, Michael
  • Re: zero of continuous functions, Michael
• Orwell and Fuller, Clifford J. Nelson
• differential equations and linguistics, alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: differential equations and linguistics, Keith A. Lewis
• Problem on complex derivative, Lin. S.
  • Re: Problem on complex derivative, Lin. S.
• Re: "a/b" stuff - please help!, Robert Low
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "a/b" stuff - please help!, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: "a/b" stuff - please help!, The Qurqirish Dragon
• Phase in frequency convolution, Pablo M
  • Re: Phase in frequency convolution, Mathue Hagen
    • Re: Phase in frequency convolution, Pablo M
      • Re: Phase in frequency convolution, Randy Poe
• statistical problem, Jonas
  • Re: statistical problem, Mathue Hagen
    • Re: statistical problem, Jonas
      • Re: statistical problem, Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: statistical problem, david bandel
  • Message not available
    • Re: statistical problem, Rob Johnson
      • Re: statistical problem, Jonas
      • Message not available
      • Re: statistical problem, Rob Johnson
• with Q., mina_world
  • Re: with Q., Nobody
  • Re: with Q., Arturo Magidin
    • Re: with Q., gwlucky
      • Re: with Q., Dave Seaman
      • Re: with Q., gwlucky
      • Re: with Q., Arturo Magidin
      • Re: with Q., gwlucky
      • Re: with Q., gwlucky
      • Re: with Q., Dave Rusin
      • Re: with Q., gwlucky
      • Re: with Q., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: with Q., Arturo Magidin
      • Google groups bugs [was: with Q.], Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Google groups bugs [was: with Q.], Arturo Magidin
      • Re: with Q., Michael Stemper
• Transcendence degree of Coeff f, viz
• sum/sigma and modulus of a decimal number, spin9
  • Re: sum/sigma and modulus of a decimal number, Peter Webb
    • Re: sum/sigma and modulus of a decimal number, spin9
• Re: adult dating made easy, fishfry
  • Re: adult dating made easy, William Elliot
• relatively prime ideals ..., HY
  • Re: relatively prime ideals ..., Peter L. Montgomery
• Irreducibility, Julien Santini
  • Re: Irreducibility, quasi
    • Re: Irreducibility, Robert Israel
      • Re: Irreducibility, Gerry Myerson
• rotation matrices, bob
  • Re: rotation matrices, Ted Hwa
    • Re: rotation matrices, bob
      • Re: rotation matrices, Ted Hwa
      • Re: rotation matrices, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: rotation matrices, bob
      • Re: rotation matrices, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: rotation matrices, bob
      • Re: rotation matrices-, JEMebius
      • Re: rotation matrices- PitchYaw, JEMebius
      • Re: rotation matrices, Jyrki Lahtonen
    • Re: rotation matrices, gwlucky
      • Re: rotation matrices, bob
      • Re: rotation matrices, bob
• finite sum, Tobin Fricke
  • Re: finite sum, William Elliot
  • Re: finite sum, temptony
• Solving system of two equations, dontspam
  • Re: Solving system of two equations, richard . blankman
    • Re: Solving system of two equations, john_ramsden
      • Re: Solving system of two equations, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Solving system of two equations, Robert Israel
• Completely confused about the area of circles, PeterMacKenzie
  • Re: Completely confused about the area of circles, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Completely confused about the area of circles, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: Completely confused about the area of circles, PeterMacKenzie
  • Re: Completely confused about the area of circles, Robert Low
• is geometric brownian motion process a brownian motion process?, comtech
  • Re: is geometric brownian motion process a brownian motion process?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: is geometric brownian motion process a brownian motion process?, A N Niel
      • Re: is geometric brownian motion process a brownian motion process?, Herman Rubin
• zero to the power zero, Paul Connolly
  • Re: zero to the power zero, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro
  • Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Seaman
    • Re: zero to the power zero, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Seaman
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Robert Low
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Seaman
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Robert Low
  • Re: zero to the power zero, Robert Low
  • Re: zero to the power zero, Markus Sigg
  • Re: zero to the power zero, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: zero to the power zero, Dave (from the UK)
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Dave (from the UK)
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Seaman
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Dave (from the UK)
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Seaman
      • Message not available
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Rob Johnson
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Seaman
      • Message not available
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Rob Johnson
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Dave (from the UK)
      • Re: zero to the power zero, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Seaman
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Dave Rusin
  • Message not available
    • Re: zero to the power zero, Rob Johnson
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: zero to the power zero, Michael Stemper
  • Re: zero to the power zero, Robert J. Kolker
    • Re: zero to the power zero, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Message not available
      • Re: zero to the power zero, Rob Johnson
    • Re: zero to the power zero, Dik T. Winter
• re: Information Update, "Shauna Crabtree"
• Problem 1C in Milnor-Stasheff, vypertd@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Problem 1C in Milnor-Stasheff, Robert Israel
  • Re: Problem 1C in Milnor-Stasheff, William Elliot
  • Re: Problem 1C in Milnor-Stasheff, William Elliot
• method of characteristics help, quat
  • Re: method of characteristics help, Robert Israel
• MS Windows XP Professional SP2 - Our price: $65, "Nicholas"
• Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional - Our price: $120, "Nicholas"
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Adobe Acrobat 7.0 Professional - Our price: $120, "Rogert"
• convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., katy
  • Re: convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., katy
      • Re: convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., A N Niel
  • Re: convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., Ronald Bruck
    • Re: convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., Robert Israel
      • Re: convergence of series involving arctan, arcsin or arccos., katy
• Example or counterexample in differentiation problems, agentmath
  • Re: Example or counterexample in differentiation problems, agentmath
  • Re: Example or counterexample in differentiation problems, David C. Ullrich
• find x. humor~, mina_world
  • Re: find x. humor~, agentmath
• sim. solution to quadratic bivariate equations, Markus Moll
• with simple inequality, mina_world
  • Re: with simple inequality, Alex. Lupas
  • Re: with simple inequality, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: with simple inequality, mina_world
• high-dimensional squared sum probability, Purzelbiene
  • Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, gwlucky
    • Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, Purzelbiene
      • Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, gwlucky
  • Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, Herman Rubin
  • Message not available
    • Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, Rob Johnson
      • Message not available
      • Re: high-dimensional squared sum probability, Rob Johnson
• Re: super-Hopf algebras, Sacha Blumen
  • Re: super-Hopf algebras, José Carlos Santos
• inequality, Wilbert
  • Re: inequality, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
  • Re: inequality, BSK
  • Message not available
    • Re: inequality, Rob Johnson
• calculation of integral, magda
  • Re: calculation of integral, Michael Jĝrgensen
  • Re: calculation of integral, A N Niel
  • Re: calculation of integral, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro
  • Re: calculation of integral, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• Russell set..., mina_world
  • Re: Russell set..., Darren
    • Re: Russell set..., Richard Harter
      • Re: Russell set..., Herman Rubin
• Insphere of a tetrahedron, Hauke Reddmann
  • Re: Insphere of a tetrahedron, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro
  • Re: Insphere of a tetrahedron, Rouben Rostamian
    • Re: Insphere of a tetrahedron, Hauke Reddmann
  • Message not available
    • Re: Insphere of a tetrahedron, Rob Johnson
  • Re: Insphere of a tetrahedron, Rouben Rostamian
    • Re: Insphere of a tetrahedron, Hauke Reddmann
      • Re: Insphere of a tetrahedron, Thomas Mautsch
• stat problem, Michael Jĝrgensen
  • Re: stat problem, Torsten Hennig
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • stat problem, Bill Taylor
• Regression - Least squares, Naebad
  • Re: Regression - Least squares, Virgil
  • Re: Regression - Least squares, Rod
    • Re: Regression - Least squares, gwlucky
  • Re: Regression - Least squares, Herman Rubin
    • Re: Regression - Least squares, Gottfried Helms
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Regression - Least squares, Oscar Lanzi III
• Microsoft Office XP Professional - Our price: $110, "Philip"
• Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus, Narcoleptic Insomniac
• Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, inquirydog
  • Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, gwlucky
    • Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, gwlucky
  • Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
    • Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, inquirydog
      • Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, Robert Low
      • Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, inquirydog
      • Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, inquirydog
      • Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, inquirydog
      • Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, Robert Low
      • Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, inquirydog
      • Re: Given the christoffel symbols (in differential geometry), can I solve for the metric, Robert Low
• discrete form for grad(div v), NordinZ
• linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul
  • Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul
      • Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, Robert Israel
      • Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul
      • Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, Robert Israel
      • Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul
      • Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul
      • Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, Robert Israel
      • Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul
      • Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul
      • Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, Robert Israel
  • Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, nir cohen
    • Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, Robert Israel
  • Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, nir cohen
    • Re: linear differential equation with non-linear coefficients, paul
• simple PDE, quat
  • Re: simple PDE, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Galois group calculation, adomplayer
  • Re: Galois group calculation, Peter L. Montgomery
    • Re: Galois group calculation, adomplayer
      • Re: Galois group calculation, steiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• re: January 16, 2006 Inv Update, "Martina Lassiter"
• Self made mathematician, JDrozen
  • Re: Self made mathematician, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Self made mathematician, A Aitken
  • Re: Self made mathematician, quasi
    • Re: Self made mathematician, gwlucky
      • Re: Self made mathematician, gwlucky
      • Re: Self made mathematician, gwlucky
      • Re: Self made mathematician, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Self made mathematician, gwlucky
  • Re: Self made mathematician, JDrozen
    • Re: Self made mathematician, conesetter
    • Re: Self made mathematician, gwlucky
      • Re: Self made mathematician, david bandel
      • Re: Self made mathematician, gwlucky
• Ellipse Construction., jeuro
  • Re: Ellipse Construction., [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Ellipse Construction., [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: Ellipse Construction., jeuro
    • Re: Ellipse Construction., [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: Ellipse Construction., jeuro
    • Re: Ellipse Construction., [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• projective simplicial sets, singau
• examples, leo1476
  • Re: examples, Robert Israel
    • Re: examples, David C . Ullrich
• Minimal Area Canopy, Narasimham
  • Re: Minimal Area Canopy, Mathue Hagen
    • Re: Minimal Area Canopy, Narasimham
      • Re: Minimal Area Canopy, Mathue Hagen
• Ellipsoid equation - converting from algebraic, Roger Rowland
  • Re: Ellipsoid equation - converting from algebraic, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro
    • Re: Ellipsoid equation - converting from algebraic, Roger Rowland
• Someone knows this? Need help with an equation., Jolie
  • Re: Someone knows this? Need help with an equation., Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Someone knows this? Need help with an equation., Ken Pledger
• Inequalities for convex functions, alexandru . lupas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Inequalities for convex functions, Alex. Lupas
• Poisson Stochastic Process, Derek
  • Re: Poisson Stochastic Process, David M Einstein
    • Re: Poisson Stochastic Process, Derek
      • Re: Poisson Stochastic Process, David M Einstein
• inf{(Qx,x)|Fx=h}, Sergiy M.Zhuk
  • Re: inf{(Qx,x)|Fx=h}, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: inf{(Qx,x)|Fx=h}, Sergiy M. Zhuk
      • Re: inf{(Qx,x)|Fx=h}, Jannick Asmus
• Gaussin integers, Isura
  • Re: Gaussin integers, mskirvin
    • Re: Gaussin integers, Bill Dubuque
• Hom as a representable functor?, Stephen Lavelle
• Fields, Abdulla
  • Re: Fields, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Fields, Abdulla
    • Re: Fields, Pete Klimek
• Elementary probabilty problem, Bipp
  • Re: Elementary probabilty problem, Peter Webb
  • Message not available
    • Re: Elementary probabilty problem, Rob Johnson
• difference between partial derivative, and derivative, damage
  • Re: difference between partial derivative, and derivative, Kaimbridge
  • Re: difference between partial derivative, and derivative, Pubkeybreaker
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 16, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), John Gabbriel
  • Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Darren
  • Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Martin Wanvik
    • Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), denis feldmann
      • Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Martin Wanvik
    • Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), John Gabbriel
      • Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Dave Seaman
      • Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), John Gabbriel
      • Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Dave Seaman
      • Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Keith F. Lynch
      • Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Christopher J. Henrich
  • Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Keith F. Lynch
    • Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s),
      • Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), Dave Seaman
      • Re: Questions about zeroes of Riemann-Zeta function Z(s), David C . Ullrich
• covergent series, leo1476
  • Re: covergent series, leo1476
  • Re: covergent series, quasi
  • Re: covergent series, Mkajuma
    • Re: covergent series, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: covergent series, quasi
  • Re: covergent series, Mkajuma
  • Re: covergent series, David C . Ullrich
• Find the center of unicyclic graph, Wilma
• on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Kenneth Bull
  • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, David Moran
    • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, JeeBee
    • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, G.E. Ivey
  • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Rob
    • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, A Aitken
    • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, A Aitken
    • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, True Raptor
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Ronald Bruck
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, True Raptor
    • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, G.E. Ivey
  • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, A Aitken
  • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi
  • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Kenneth Bull
  • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, john_ramsden
    • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Kenneth Bull
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, john_ramsden
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, john_ramsden
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Kenneth Bull
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Kenneth Bull
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Virgil
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Luke Wu
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Luke Wu
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Luke Wu
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Virgil
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, Virgil
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, True Raptor
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, quasi
    • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, True Raptor
    • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: on what interval(s) is the function f(x) = x^3 increasing?, sengal . kiru
• 3 equations with 3 variables on a Ti-89 Titanium?, Jakob
  • Re: 3 equations with 3 variables on a Ti-89 Titanium?, quasi
    • Re: 3 equations with 3 variables on a Ti-89 Titanium?, jakob
      • Re: 3 equations with 3 variables on a Ti-89 Titanium?, quasi
      • Re: 3 equations with 3 variables on a Ti-89 Titanium?, Ken Oliver
  • Re: 3 equations with 3 variables on a Ti-89 Titanium?, Michael Varney
• Isotropic tensor functions, andrea
• How should mathematical models be produced?, Bryan Bishop
  • Re: How should mathematical models be produced?, peterX
  • Re: How should mathematical models be produced?, cbrown
    • Re: How should mathematical models be produced?, Bryan Bishop
      • Re: How should mathematical models be produced?, cbrown
• Singular, Dick Barends
  • Re: Singular, Torkel Franzen
  • Re: Singular, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Singular, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Singular, Gottfried Helms
• I'm so confused..., David C . Ullrich
  • Re: I'm so confused..., Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: I'm so confused..., David C . Ullrich
    • Re: I'm so confused..., Daniel Grubb
      • Re: I'm so confused..., Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: I'm so confused..., Dave Rusin
      • Re: I'm so confused..., Daniel Grubb
  • Re: I'm so confused..., José Carlos Santos
    • Re: I'm so confused..., David C . Ullrich
    • Re: I'm so confused..., Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: I'm so confused..., Igor Khavkine
    • Re: I'm so confused..., Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: I'm so confused..., David C . Ullrich
    • Re: I'm so confused..., David C . Ullrich
  • Re: I'm so confused..., David C . Ullrich
  • Re: I'm so confused..., john_ramsden
  • Re: I'm so confused..., David C . Ullrich
• Abelian Unital Magma, tontoko
• trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, one_time_fool
  • Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, one_time_fool
      • Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, abe . buckingham
      • Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, one_time_fool
      • Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, abe . buckingham
  • Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: trying to remember "transformations" linear algebra, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• An observation and question about orthogonality, psychoblade55
  • Re: An observation and question about orthogonality, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: An observation and question about orthogonality, Thomas Mautsch
• Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, a_plutonium
  • Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, a_plutonium
    • Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, a_plutonium
  • Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Proginoskes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Narcoleptic Insomniac
    • Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Proginoskes
  • Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanation; Chord concept, Narcoleptic Insomniac
• random variables - simple questions, Tobin Fricke
  • Re: random variables - simple questions, Andrea Vedaldi
  • Re: random variables - simple questions, Randy Poe
  • Re: random variables - simple questions, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Message not available
      • Re: random variables - simple questions, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• Introductory inspiring math books, Bjorn Edstrom
  • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Rob
    • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Narcoleptic Insomniac
    • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Bjorn Edstrom
  • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Bjorn Edstrom
      • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, gwlucky
      • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, David Park
    • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Bjorn Edstrom
  • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, john_ramsden
  • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Bill Dubuque
    • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Christopher J. Henrich
  • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, rip pelletier
    • Re: Introductory inspiring math books, Karl M. Bunday
• Are the rationals a subset of the reals?, Darren
  • Re: Are the rationals a subset of the reals?, N. Silver
  • Re: Are the rationals a subset of the reals?, fishfry
    • Re: Are the rationals a subset of the reals?, Proginoskes
      • Re: Are the rationals a subset of the reals?, Ross A. Finlayson
  • Re: Are the rationals a subset of the reals?, MoeBlee
• math question from struggling college student, mel
  • Re: math question from struggling college student, LC Killingbeck
    • Re: math question from struggling college student, Proginoskes
      • Re: math question from struggling college student, LC Killingbeck
  • Re: math question from struggling college student, Fermat
    • Re: math question from struggling college student, David Ames
  • Re: math question from struggling college student, mathedman
• complex integral, tanabai
  • Re: complex integral, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: complex integral, tanabai
      • Re: complex integral, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: complex integral, tanabai
  • Re: complex integral, Paul Abbott
    • Re: complex integral, tanabai
      • Message not available
      • Re: complex integral, Rob Johnson
• Simple components and great results, Roman B. Binder
• differentiating a relation with respect to a variable that is not part of it?!?!?!, i . love . jeevitha
  • Re: differentiating a relation with respect to a variable that is not part of it?!?!?!, smn
  • Re: differentiating a relation with respect to a variable that is not part of it?!?!?!, Rob Johnson
  • Re: differentiating a relation with respect to a variable that is not part of it?!?!?!, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: differentiating a relation with respect to a variable that is not part of it?!?!?!, Narasimham
  • Re: differentiating a relation with respect to a variable that is not part of it?!?!?!, Randy Poe
  • Re: differentiating a relation with respect to a variable that is not part of it?!?!?!, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• signed measures, total variation, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: signed measures, total variation, smn
    • Re: signed measures, total variation, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx
• JOHN R RAMSDEN, I didn´t know how to contact you again!, Jolie
  • Re: JOHN R RAMSDEN, I didn´t know how to contact you again!, john_ramsden
    • Re: JOHN R RAMSDEN, I didn´t know how to contact you again!, mzafrullah
• seeking catenoids/helicoids, Sean McIlroy
  • Re: seeking catenoids/helicoids, Roger Bagula
• Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, heich1
  • Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, bijan
    • Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, sengal . kiru
  • Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, abe . buckingham
  • Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
    • Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, bert
      • Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, john_ramsden
      • Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, Keith F. Lynch
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, Keith F. Lynch
      • Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, Robert Israel
  • Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, Proginoskes
  • Re: Is it true that works of mathematical geniuses are created when they under 40?, David R Tribble
• The crucial test, hagen
• question in spivak's calculus on manifolds, Someonekicked
  • Re: question in spivak's calculus on manifolds, smn
  • Re: question in spivak's calculus on manifolds, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: question in spivak's calculus on manifolds, Someonekicked
    • Re: question in spivak's calculus on manifolds, smn
• difference between continuation et série, guillaume07
  • Re: difference between continuation et série, Jean-Pierre MERX
  • Re: difference between continuation et série, Jean-Pierre MERX
• difference between suite et série, guillaume07
  • Re: difference between suite et série, mathedman
• The Mystery of Numerical Consciousness, mikeh106@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: The Mystery of Numerical Consciousness, Beelidge
    • Re: The Mystery of Numerical Consciousness, mikeh106@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: The Mystery of Numerical Consciousness, bijan
• with sample space., mina_world
  • Message not available
    • Re: with sample space., Rob Johnson
      • Re: with sample space., mina_world
      • Re: with sample space., David C . Ullrich
      • Message not available
      • Re: with sample space., Rob Johnson
• I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, jolina
  • Re: I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, paps
    • Re: I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, Jolie
  • Re: I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, Rob Johnson
    • Re: I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, Rob Johnson
  • Re: I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, john_ramsden
    • Re: I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, Jolie
  • Re: I have i mathematical problem I need some help with, please!, bill
• Name for a technique (polynomials and matrices), ciphergoth
  • Re: Name for a technique (polynomials and matrices), [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Name for a technique (polynomials and matrices), Paul Crowley
  • Re: Name for a technique (polynomials and matrices), Randy Poe
• Opposite of projection, Enila Nero
  • Re: Opposite of projection, Narasimham
  • Re: Opposite of projection, Jules
• derivative of sqrt(x), deniz . bahar
  • Re: derivative of sqrt(x), José Carlos Santos
  • Re: derivative of sqrt(x), The World Wide Wade
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • derivative of sqrt(x), deniz . bahar
    • Re: derivative of sqrt(x), Maulana Gott
      • Re: derivative of sqrt(x), Ronald Bruck
      • Re: derivative of sqrt(x), Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: derivative of sqrt(x), deniz . bahar
    • Re: derivative of sqrt(x), Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: derivative of sqrt(x), The Qurqirish Dragon
• Second derivative test, Kenneth Bull
  • Re: Second derivative test, CB4ever
    • Re: Second derivative test, Ronald Bruck
      • Re: Second derivative test, CB4ever
  • Re: Second derivative test, Kenneth Bull
    • Re: Second derivative test, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Second derivative test, Ronald Bruck
      • Re: Second derivative test, Kenneth Bull
      • Re: Second derivative test, CB4ever
      • Re: Second derivative test, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Second derivative test, Kenneth Bull
      • Re: Second derivative test, Kenneth Bull
      • Re: Second derivative test, Kobu
      • Re: Second derivative test, Kenneth Bull
      • Re: Second derivative test, sengal . kiru
      • Re: Second derivative test, quasi
      • Re: Second derivative test, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Second derivative test, quasi
      • Re: Second derivative test, Ronald Bruck
      • Re: Second derivative test, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Second derivative test, Ronald Bruck
    • Re: Second derivative test, Ronald Bruck
• ? something similar to similarity matrices, Cheng Cosine
  • Re: ? something similar to similarity matrices, Robert Israel
    • Re: ? something similar to similarity matrices, Cheng Cosine
      • Re: ? something similar to similarity matrices, Cheng Cosine
      • Re: ? something similar to similarity matrices, Robert Israel
• Q function, Yoong Ping Lim
  • Re: Q function, john
    • Re: Q function, mikelim
• need recursive function of Peano curve, paulgfx
  • Re: need recursive function of Peano curve, Ioannis
    • Re: need recursive function of Peano curve, paulgfx
• Angle of Rise and Decline., jeuro
  • Re: Angle of Rise and Decline., Russell
  • Re: Angle of Rise and Decline., jeuro
    • Re: Angle of Rise and Decline., Russell
  • Re: Angle of Rise and Decline., jeuro
    • Re: Angle of Rise and Decline., Russell
  • Re: Angle of Rise and Decline., josevb69
• Inequality - Product_k (1 - exp(-x^k)), W
  • Re: Inequality - Product_k (1 - exp(-x^k)), Dr Tim
    • Re: Inequality - Product_k (1 - exp(-x^k)), W
      • Re: Inequality - Product_k (1 - exp(-x^k)), [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: Inequality - Product_k (1 - exp(-x^k)), Robert Israel
    • Re: Inequality - Product_k (1 - exp(-x^k)), W
    • Message not available
      • Re: Inequality - Product_k (1 - exp(-x^k)), W
• discrete math help., cd_panic
  • Re: discrete math help., Russell
  • Re: discrete math help., frank . ferrese
    • Re: discrete math help., Russell
  • Re: discrete math help., briggs
    • Re: discrete math help., cd_panic
      • Re: discrete math help., Frank Ferrese
      • Re: discrete math help., cd_panic
      • The crucial test, hagen
      • Re: discrete math help., Oscar Lanzi III
  • Message not available
    • Re: discrete math help., Rob Johnson
      • Re: discrete math help., Frank Ferrese
      • Message not available
      • Re: discrete math help., Rob Johnson
• Newbie plane geometry question., astutesolutions
  • Re: Newbie plane geometry question., Randy Poe
    • Re: Newbie plane geometry question., astutesolutions
      • Re: Newbie plane geometry question., Randy Poe
      • Re: Newbie plane geometry question., astutesolutions
      • Re: Newbie plane geometry question., Randy Poe
      • Re: Newbie plane geometry question., astutesolutions
      • Re: Newbie plane geometry question., astutesolutions
  • Re: Newbie plane geometry question., bill
• help with algebra/exponentials please!, surferdude303
  • Re: help with algebra/exponentials please!, Russell
    • Re: help with algebra/exponentials please!, surferdude303
  • Re: help with algebra/exponentials please!, Jim Black
  • Re: help with algebra/exponentials please!, A N Niel
  • Re: help with algebra/exponentials please!, surferdude303
• infimum of the spectrum, tanabai
• Sum of truncated normal variables, Hicham Daher
  • Message not available
    • Re: Sum of truncated normal variables, Hicham Daher
      • Re: Sum of truncated normal variables, Herman Rubin
• Help needed with fractals!!!, SagarC.
• series (-1)^n*|sin(n)|/n, donald girod
  • Re: series (-1)^n*|sin(n)|/n, David C. Ullrich
    • Re: series (-1)^n*|sin(n)|/n, h . tracy
      • Re: series (-1)^n*|sin(n)|/n, donald girod
      • Re: series (-1)^n*|sin(n)|/n, Ronald Bruck
      • Re: series (-1)^n*|sin(n)|/n, Robert Israel
  • Re: series (-1)^n*|sin(n)|/n, Eric Gisse
• help needed!!!!!!!!, SagarC.
  • Continuously parameterized fractal dimension. Was Re: help needed!!!!!!!!, Randy Poe
    • Re: Continuously parameterized fractal dimension. Was Re: help needed!!!!!!!!, SagarC.
      • Re: Continuously parameterized fractal dimension. Was Re: help needed!!!!!!!!, Randy Poe
• Re: Quadratic Probing!!! I have a problem, namtrum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Quadratic Probing!!! I have a problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Arzela-Ascoli historical, G. A. Edgar
  • Re: Arzela-Ascoli historical, ArtflDodgr
• missing data estimation in matrix, Tobias Wagner
• Re: email-- prime number pattern, Paul Elwood
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: email-- prime number pattern, Paul Elwood
    • Re: email-- prime number pattern, Michael Orion
    • Re: email-- prime number pattern, LC Killingbeck
    • Re: email-- prime number pattern, Dave Rusin
• differentiability of function, Karel
  • Re: differentiability of function, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: differentiability of function, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: differentiability of function, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: differentiability of function, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: differentiability of function, Karel
      • Re: differentiability of function, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: differentiability of function, Karel
      • Re: differentiability of function, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: differentiability of function, Dusan
      • Re: differentiability of function, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: differentiability of function, Karel
• prove the inequation, donkey
  • Re: prove the inequation, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
    • Re: prove the inequation, donkey
      • Re: prove the inequation, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: prove the inequation, Thomas Mautsch
      • Re: prove the inequation, donkey
      • Re: prove the inequation, David
      • Re: prove the inequation, Thomas Mautsch
  • Re: prove the inequation, Thomas Mautsch
  • Re: prove the inequation, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: prove the inequation, Thomas Mautsch
• basics, Matematyk
• prolog, Matematyk
• f', integral of f multiplicative inverses?, Proginoskes
  • Re: f', integral of f multiplicative inverses?, Robert Israel
    • Re: f', integral of f multiplicative inverses?, Proginoskes
• using limits of f '(x) to show that f(x) has vertical tangents, CB4ever
  • Re: using limits of f '(x) to show that f(x) has vertical tangents, Robert Israel
• with cyclic group., mina_world
  • Re: with cyclic group., Jim Heckman
  • Re: with cyclic group.,
    • Re: with cyclic group., William Elliot
  • Re: with cyclic group., Werner Nickel
    • Re: with cyclic group., William Elliot
• Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Wieferich primes and a wikipedia statement, Gottfried Helms
• Why open interval conditions?, Luke Wu
  • Re: Why open interval conditions?, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Why open interval conditions?, Luke Wu
      • Re: Why open interval conditions?, David C. Ullrich
      • Re: Why open interval conditions?, Luke Wu
• Measure Theory, Naebad
  • Re: Measure Theory, smn
    • Re: Measure Theory, Naebad
• request an example, sunnewton
  • Re: request an example, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: request an example, The World Wide Wade
• what is this number?, conradeaton
  • Re: what is this number?, Bob
  • Re: what is this number?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: what is this number?, conradeaton
• Reading and pronouncing math for self-study, Herb Martin
  • Re: Reading and pronouncing math for self-study, Herb Martin
  • Re: Reading and pronouncing math for self-study, Larry Lard
    • Re: Reading and pronouncing math for self-study, Herb Martin
  • Re: Reading and pronouncing math for self-study, Herb Martin
    • Re: Reading and pronouncing math for self-study, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Reading and pronouncing math for self-study, Herb Martin
• Arithmetic Approximations of the Perimeter of an Ellipse, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: Arithmetic Approximations of the Perimeter of an Ellipse, Paul Abbott
• Dot product 3-dimensions, steve_mccrone
  • Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, LC Killingbeck
  • Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, David Moran
  • Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, Ray Koopman
    • Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, steve_mccrone
      • Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, Ray Koopman
      • Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, steve_mccrone
      • Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, Ray Koopman
      • Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, steve_mccrone
    • Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, steve_mccrone
      • Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, Ray Koopman
      • Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, steve_mccrone
      • Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, Ray Koopman
  • Re: Dot product 3-dimensions, Dave Rusin
• "Toplogical" saddle point, Andrea Vedaldi
  • Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Dave Rusin
    • Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Andrea Vedaldi
      • Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Dave Rusin
      • Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Narasimham
      • Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Andrea Vedaldi
  • Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Narasimham
    • Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Andrea Vedaldi
  • Re: "Toplogical" saddle point, Daniel Grubb
• I have some very attractive Quant jobs open to 180K in NYC, The job lady
• Mersenne primes,triangle numbers and even perfect numbers., Dan
• LSC, RamT
  • Re: LSC, smn
  • Re: LSC, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: LSC, RamT
      • Re: LSC, David C. Ullrich
• Re: The Exchange Paradox, Domenico Rosa
• Derivative formulas, InvalidUser4444
  • Re: Derivative formulas, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: Derivative formulas, Maulana Gott
  • Re: Derivative formulas, Robert Low
• matrices, Robert
  • Re: matrices, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: matrices, Robert
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Matrices, Robert
    • Re: Matrices, Paul Sperry
      • Re: Matrices, William McWorter
• Pythagorean theorem, haoc
  • Re: Pythagorean theorem, José Carlos Santos
• mathematical model for standing waves in ice, rich_clayton03
• locating a mobile phone in an area, kritheka84@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: locating a mobile phone in an area, Maulana Polycep
    • Re: locating a mobile phone in an area, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: locating a mobile phone in an area, Jeremy Boden
      • Re: locating a mobile phone in an area, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: locating a mobile phone in an area, Randy Poe
• Re: revamping the teaching of the Calculus by using a geometrical explanati, Martin Wanvik
• standard deviation units change, S.L.Belso
• McNemar's hypothesis test, K.
• problem in real analysis, E. Ferrari
  • Re: problem in real analysis, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: problem in real analysis, E. Ferrari
  • Re: problem in real analysis, Duncan Muirhead
• [pun] 3n+1 problem, Hauke Reddmann
  • Re: [pun] 3n+1 problem, Joseph Hertzlinger
    • Re: [pun] 3n+1 problem, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: [pun] 3n+1 problem, Gottfried Helms
• infinite numbers, Grant Johnson
  • Re: infinite numbers, Larry Lard
  • Re: infinite numbers, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: infinite numbers, Proginoskes
  • Re: infinite numbers, mathedman
  • Re: infinite numbers, Michael Orion
• Generate a sparse symmetric positive-definite matrix, newbix
  • Re: Generate a sparse symmetric positive-definite matrix, Duncan Muirhead
  • Re: Generate a sparse symmetric positive-definite matrix, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• infinite series~, mina_world
  • Re: infinite series~, quasi
    • Re: infinite series~, mina_world
      • Re: infinite series~, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: infinite series~, quasi
      • Re: infinite series~, mina_world
      • Re: infinite series~, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro
      • Re: infinite series~, quasi
• prove that in the process of gauss Jordan elimination, the row space of a matrix does not change, RemiBernal
  • Re: prove that in the process of gauss Jordan elimination, the row space of a matrix does not change, abe . buckingham
  • Re: prove that in the process of gauss Jordan elimination, the row space of a matrix does not change, Proginoskes
• Algorithms for continued fractions of reals and rationals, and for GCD, Gabriel Maybrun
  • Re: Algorithms for continued fractions of reals and rationals, and for GCD, Christopher J. Henrich
• CFP: The International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2006, imecs__2006
• Is this a valid argument?, junoexpress
  • Re: Is this a valid argument?, Robert Israel
    • Re: Is this a valid argument?, junoexpress
      • Re: Is this a valid argument?, Robert Israel
• Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, fermat
  • Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Minus XVII
  • Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Stephen Merriman
  • Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, richard . blankman
    • Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Minus XVII
      • Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Minus XVII
    • Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Dave (from the UK)
      • Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Fermat
      • Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Minus XVII
    • Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, cptbanjo
      • Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Richard Miller
      • Re: Fermat's actual proof of FLT?, Roman B. Binder
• sample size vs. Principal Components Analysis (PCA), Roy
• a subset in X A is dense iff X intersection A is not empty, John Smith
  • Re: a subset in X A is dense iff X intersection A is not empty, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: a subset in X A is dense iff X intersection A is not empty, John Smith
      • Re: a subset in X A is dense iff X intersection A is not empty, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: a subset in X A is dense iff X intersection A is not empty, John Smith
• trig. formula Question, incon
  • Re: trig. formula Question, Dave Seaman
    • Message not available
      • Re: trig. formula Question, Rob Johnson
    • Re: trig. formula Question, Keith F. Lynch
  • Message not available
    • Re: trig. formula Question, majamin
• The 3n+1 Conjecture, richard . blankman
  • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, richard . blankman
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Proginoskes
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert Low
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert Low
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert Low
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert Low
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert Low
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert Low
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Proginoskes
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Christian Bau
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Robert Low
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Proginoskes
      • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: The 3n+1 Conjecture, Torkel Franzen
• number combinations of components, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: number combinations of components, Proginoskes
    • Re: number combinations of components, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: number combinations of components, Keith A. Lewis
      • Re: number combinations of components, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: number combinations of components, Proginoskes
      • Re: number combinations of components, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: number combinations of components, Proginoskes
      • Re: number combinations of components, Abstract Dissonance
• group structure, Samuel Fenelly
  • Re: group structure, fernando revilla
  • Re: group structure, Paul Sperry
  • Re: group structure,
• Non-Archimedean Field Valuation Property, alex . virdol
  • Re: Non-Archimedean Field Valuation Property, JoeS
    • Re: Non-Archimedean Field Valuation Property, alex . virdol
      • Re: Non-Archimedean Field Valuation Property, Minus XVII
  • Re: Non-Archimedean Field Valuation Property, lataianu bogdan
    • Re: Non-Archimedean Field Valuation Property, Hagen
• A possible gap in the proof of The Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory in the Garling's book, ulinnick
• similar to Darboux's theorem, mina_world
  • Re: similar to Darboux's theorem, José Carlos Santos
• | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Amanda
  • Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Robert Israel
    • Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Amanda
    • Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Herman Rubin
      • Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Amanda
  • Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, michaeld
  • Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Ronald Bruck
    • Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Ronald Bruck
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, michaeld
      • Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Robert Sheskey
      • Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, michaeld
      • Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, Robert Sheskey
      • Re: | f(x) - f(y) | <= |x -y|, michaeld
• re: ATTENTION - S.H. Update, "Amber Mcknight"
• sums of zeta, graumet
  • Re: sums of zeta, Paul Abbott
• Maxima of Functions in Spherical Harmonic Representation, Mario
  • Re: Maxima of Functions in Spherical Harmonic Representation, john
    • Re: Maxima of Functions in Spherical Harmonic Representation, Mario
  • Re: Maxima of Functions in Spherical Harmonic Representation, David Park
    • Re: Maxima of Functions in Spherical Harmonic Representation, Mario
      • Re: Maxima of Functions in Spherical Harmonic Representation, David Park
• traingulation in mobile networking, kritheka84@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: traingulation in mobile networking, Physar Polycep
• Re: New Scientist & AIA Goof on Heim Hyperdrive, Larry Hammick
• Ito Lemma, Blase
• about a set!, sunnewton
  • Re: about a set!, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: about a set!, G.E. Ivey
  • Re: about a set!, fishfry
    • Re: about a set!, MoeBlee
• significance of det of symmetric matrix, ramakrishnan . kannan
  • Re: significance of det of symmetric matrix, smn
    • Re: significance of det of symmetric matrix, Robert Israel
• Q on representations of infinite groups, kj
  • Re: Q on representations of infinite groups, Robert Israel
    • Re: Q on representations of infinite groups, kj
  • Re: Q on representations of infinite groups, cbrown
• Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
    • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, fishfry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, fishfry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, michaeld
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, examachine
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, John Savard
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
    • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, imaginatorium
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
    • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, imaginatorium
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, imaginatorium
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert Low
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, G . Frege
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Keith Ramsay
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Keith Ramsay
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Keith Ramsay
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Chip Eastham
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Chas Brown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Chas Brown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Russell
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Toni Lassila
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, imaginatorium
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, imaginatorium
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, stephen
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, briggs
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Toni Lassila
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Toni Lassila
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Toni Lassila
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Toni Lassila
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, imaginatorium
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, MoeBlee
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, cbrown
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, David R Tribble
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Toni Lassila
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Virgil
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
    • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han . deBruijn
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, apoorv
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, apoorv
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, apoorv
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Dik T. Winter
• Re: Integral: help!, Peter L. Montgomery
  • Re: Integral: help!, steiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Integral: help!, Casey Hawthorne
• orthogonal transformation and rotation, Roy
  • Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation- Wikipedia, Mathworld, JEMebius
    • Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation- Wikipedia, Mathworld, Virgil
      • Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation- Wikipedia, Mathworld-, JEMebius
      • Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation- Wikipedia, Mathworld-, Michael Orion
  • Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation, Michael Orion
  • Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation, Gordon
  • Re: orthogonal transformation and rotation, Randall
• Space filling function?, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: Space filling function?, William Elliot
  • Re: Space filling function?, David C . Ullrich
• cover and subcover (topology), thomas
  • Re: cover and subcover (topology), Arturo Magidin
    • Re: cover and subcover (topology), Robert Israel
      • Re: cover and subcover (topology), Arturo Magidin
    • Re: cover and subcover (topology), thomas
      • Re: cover and subcover (topology), Arturo Magidin
  • Re: cover and subcover (topology), Russell
    • Re: cover and subcover (topology), Russell
  • Re: cover and subcover (topology), Ronald Bruck
  • Re: cover and subcover (topology), Robert Israel
• Distance between 2 points on a globe, draccarlawpet
  • Re: Distance between 2 points on a globe, Physar Polycep
  • Re: Distance between 2 points on a globe, Dave Seaman
  • Re: Distance between 2 points on a globe, Hans van Duijnhoven
• Sampling Without Replacement, Jim Dars
  • Re: Sampling Without Replacement, quasi
    • Re: Sampling Without Replacement, Jim Dars
      • Re: Sampling Without Replacement, JoeS
      • Re: Sampling Without Replacement, JoeS
      • Re: Sampling Without Replacement, Jim Dars
      • Re: Sampling Without Replacement, JoeS
    • Re: Sampling Without Replacement, Dave Rusin
      • Re: Sampling Without Replacement, JoeS
      • Re: Sampling Without Replacement, Jim Dars
      • Re: Sampling Without Replacement, Chip Eastham
• beginner set theory question, tlicious
  • Re: beginner set theory question, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: beginner set theory question, tlicious
      • Re: beginner set theory question, Arturo Magidin
  • Message not available
    • Re: beginner set theory question, Arturo Magidin
• continued fraction and approximation, Onno Garms
  • Re: continued fraction and approximation, John Gabbriel
  • Re: continued fraction and approximation, Helmut Richter
    • Re: continued fraction and approximation, Helmut Richter
• Chat With New Friends and girl friends, letsjoy
• Finding simple cycles approximating target distance, KoenM
  • Re: Finding simple cycles approximating target distance, Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: Finding simple cycles approximating target distance, KoenM
  • Re: Finding simple cycles approximating target distance, Robert Israel
    • Re: Finding simple cycles approximating target distance, KoenM
      • Re: Finding simple cycles approximating target distance, Robert Israel
      • Re: Finding simple cycles approximating target distance, KoenM
• why an authentic criminal should finish elementary math, ziman137
  • Re: why an authentic criminal should finish elementary math, quasi
  • Re: why an authentic criminal should finish elementary math, quasi
  • Re: why an authentic criminal should finish elementary math, john_ramsden
  • Re: why an authentic criminal should finish elementary math, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: why an authentic criminal should finish elementary math, abe . buckingham
      • Re: why an authentic criminal should finish elementary math, Gib Bogle
  • Re: why an authentic criminal should finish elementary math, david bandel
• Expected value, PARASHAR
  • Re: Expected value, PARASHAR
  • Re: Expected value, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Expected value, Robert Israel
    • Re: Expected value, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Expected value, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Message not available
      • Re: Expected value, Rob Johnson
  • Re: Expected value, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Expected value, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Expected value, PARASHAR
  • Re: Expected value, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Expected value, PARASHAR
    • Re: Expected value, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Expected value, PARASHAR
• Weighted Least Squares ( sorry, typo in subject line :-) ), dontspam
• Weigthed Least Squares, dontspam
• Calculating the distance between Point P(8,7,-2) and W: 3x+2y=12, Zuurstof
  • Re: Calculating the distance between Point P(8,7,-2) and W: 3x+2y=12, quasi
    • Re: Calculating the distance between Point P(8,7,-2) and W: 3x+2y=12, Zuurstof
  • Re: Calculating the distance between Point P(8,7,-2) and W: 3x+2y=12, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Calculating the distance between Point P(8,7,-2) and W: 3x+2y=12, Virgil
      • Re: Calculating the distance between Point P(8,7,-2) and W: 3x+2y=12, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Calculating the distance between Point P(8,7,-2) and W: 3x+2y=12, Virgil
• nonlinear nonhomogeneous ODE of second order and second degree, roman
  • Re: nonlinear nonhomogeneous ODE of second order and second degree, Robert Israel
    • Re: nonlinear nonhomogeneous ODE of second order and second degree, john_ramsden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • nonlinear nonhomogeneous ODE of second order and second degree, roman
    • Re: nonlinear nonhomogeneous ODE of second order and second degree, Herman Rubin
• Vector, triangle chaos., jeuro
  • Re: Vector, triangle chaos., jeuro
    • Re: Vector, triangle chaos., Virgil
  • Re: Vector, triangle chaos., jeuro
• Math Finance, droca
  • Re: Math Finance, Axel Vogt
• Moore-Penrose Inverse, R. S. Tiberio
  • Re: Moore-Penrose Inverse, Robert Israel
• Do you need prime numbers?, Christian Drewing
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 09, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Discrete Convolution of n Vectors, cicero
• quantum computing/group theory question, rrtucci
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • quantum computing/group theory question, rrtucci
• notation mean?, sunnewton
  • Re: notation mean?, Jules
• Re: devise a math system that every phone number is unique Re: Every science academic person in USA is being spyed upon Re: has Sprint-Nextel broken two laws on me, Jesse F. Hughes
• algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, m . topczewski
  • Re: algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, Alternaria Alternata
  • Re: algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, Rouben Rostamian
  • Re: algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, Randall
    • Re: algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, MathZhang
  • Re: algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, Virgil
    • Re: algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, MathZhang
  • Re: algorithm for checking if a point belongs to a sphere, john
• Re: x^x = 1/4, Keith F. Lynch
  • Re: x^x = 1/4, quasi
    • Re: x^x = 1/4, Ioannis
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, quasi
    • Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, quasi
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel
    • Re: x^x = 1/4, Keith F. Lynch
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, quasi
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, David R Tribble
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, Keith F. Lynch
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: x^x = 1/4, bill
    • Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, bill
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, quasi
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, bill
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, Keith F. Lynch
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, bill
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, Robert Israel
      • Re: x^x = 1/4, bill
• Using exponents law indiscriminately in Calculus I, CB4ever
  • Re: Using exponents law indiscriminately in Calculus I, Proginoskes
    • Re: Using exponents law indiscriminately in Calculus I, CB4ever
  • Re: Using exponents law indiscriminately in Calculus I, Robert Israel
  • Re: Using exponents law indiscriminately in Calculus I, Jules
• Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, Patt
  • Re: Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, Patt
      • Re: Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, David C . Ullrich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, Patt
    • Re: Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, Jules
      • Re: Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, Patt
      • Re: Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Generalized of dominated convergence theorem, David C . Ullrich
• missing solution, arolotom@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: missing solution, Robert Israel
  • Re: missing solution, Jonas
• Windows XP, All Adobe software Just go and get it for 49.95! Win XP, "Geoffrey"
• Mathematician's Obits In The NY Times, Robert Vienneau
  • Re: Mathematician's Obits In The NY Times, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Mathematician's Obits In The NY Times, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• question about projective space, Rupert
  • Re: question about projective space, Timothy Murphy
    • Re: question about projective space, Rupert
• We offer a variety of different licenses and discounts that can help you get the most out of its software budget, "Philip"
• Re: Tough Combinatorics problem?, Chip Eastham
• Re: proof, fishfry
• exponential rise of the population, Jonie
  • Re: exponential rise of the population, Robert Israel
    • Re: exponential rise of the population, Jonie
      • Re: exponential rise of the population, Robert Israel
      • Re: exponential rise of the population, Jonie
  • Re: exponential rise of the population, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: exponential rise of the population, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • It's not exponential, nor even linear (was: exponential rise of the population), markwh04
• single compartment- exponential distribution, mutiple compartments-- Erlang distribution, Jonie
• TEST, bill
  • Re: TEST, Patrick FitzGerald
    • Re: TEST, bill
    • Re: TEST, bill
• General polynomial SOE, Sensei
  • Re: General polynomial SOE, Robert Israel
• seems like cheating (more inequalities)..., Steve Mazza
  • Re: seems like cheating (more inequalities)..., José Carlos Santos
  • Re: seems like cheating (more inequalities)..., Gib Bogle
  • Re: seems like cheating (more inequalities)..., Randy Poe
  • Re: seems like cheating (more inequalities)..., Randy Poe
• l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Luke Wu
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Luke Wu
    • Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Jules
    • Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Jonas
      • Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Luke Wu
    • Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Zdislav V. Kovarik
      • Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Robert Israel
      • Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, barr
      • Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Robert Israel
      • Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: l'hospital's rule - why the condition?, The World Wide Wade
• euler characteristic of a surface presentation, Jonas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • euler characteristic of a surface presentation, Bill Taylor
  • euler characteristic of a surface presentation, Bill Taylor
    • Re: euler characteristic of a surface presentation, Jonas
  • euler characteristic of a surface presentation, Bill Taylor
• does this function have a local maximum at 3, Kobu
  • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, smn
  • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, smn
  • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, William Elliot
    • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, Kobu
      • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, quasi
      • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, Kobu
      • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, quasi
      • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, Kobu
      • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, quasi
      • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, quasi
  • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, Michael Orion
    • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, Michael Orion
      • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, smn
      • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, Michael Orion
      • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, Kobu
    • Re: does this function have a local maximum at 3, smn
• Sudoku: Rules and Strategies, altaf . khan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Sudoku: Rules and Strategies, altaf . khan
• Absolutely continuous, sets of measure zero, James
  • Re: Absolutely continuous, sets of measure zero, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Absolutely continuous, sets of measure zero, James
      • Re: Absolutely continuous, sets of measure zero, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Absolutely continuous, sets of measure zero, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Absolutely continuous, sets of measure zero, James
• Simultaneous equations...., Steve Mazza
  • Re: Simultaneous equations...., The Qurqirish Dragon
  • Re: Simultaneous equations...., The Qurqirish Dragon
  • Re: Simultaneous equations...., The Qurqirish Dragon
  • Re: Simultaneous equations...., M.A.Fajjal
    • Re: Simultaneous equations...., Steve Mazza
      • Re: Simultaneous equations...., José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Simultaneous equations...., Steve Mazza
      • Re: Simultaneous equations...., José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Simultaneous equations...., Steve Mazza
• Monge shuffle - please help, alessandra_cabrini
• dim C(A), Yo Wang
  • Re: dim C(A), Igor Khavkine
    • Re: dim C(A), Yo Wang
    • Help me again!, Yo Wang
      • Re: Help me again!, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Help me again!, Robert Israel
      • Re: Help me again!, Yo Wang
      • Re: Help me again!, Derek Holt
• From self-information to entropy, computer
• existence of differential equation, sunnewton
• Recommend algorithm for finding minimums in a function with two variabels, jonasforssell
• Maximum possible chess moves, Jose Capco
  • Re: Maximum possible chess moves, Carlos Moreno
    • Re: Maximum possible chess moves, Proginoskes
  • Re: Maximum possible chess moves, Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: Maximum possible chess moves, denis feldmann
  • Re: Maximum possible chess moves, Proginoskes
    • Re: Maximum possible chess moves, Herman Rubin
• Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, zzbunker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: why do computer scientists say 1KB=1024 bytes?!!, Naebad
• internal language of a 2 category, No One
  • Re: internal language of a 2 category, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: internal language of a 2 category, James Dolan
    • Re: internal language of a 2 category, No One
• Streamlines of a potential flow?, John Schutkeker
  • Re: Streamlines of a potential flow?, Robert Israel
    • Re: Streamlines of a potential flow?, John Schutkeker
      • Re: Streamlines of a potential flow?, Robert Israel
      • Re: Streamlines of a potential flow?, John Schutkeker
  • Re: Streamlines of a potential flow?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• Modified diffusion equation, Blase
  • Re: Modified diffusion equation, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Modified diffusion equation, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Modified diffusion equation, Blase
  • Re: Modified diffusion equation, Blase
    • Re: Modified diffusion equation, Blase
• ? spectral decomp form other than V*D*V', Cheng Cosine
  • Re: ? spectral decomp form other than V*D*V', Robert Israel
    • Re: ? spectral decomp form other than V*D*V', Cheng Cosine
  • Re: ? spectral decomp form other than V*D*V', Herman Rubin
    • Re: ? spectral decomp form other than V*D*V', Cheng Cosine
• missing solution?, zxcv_890
  • Re: missing solution?, Arturo Magidin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • missing solution?, zxcv_890
  • missing solution?, zxcv_890
    • Re: missing solution?, Stephen Merriman
    • Re: missing solution?, quasi
    • Re: missing solution?, William Elliot
  • missing solution?, zxcv_890
    • Re: missing solution?, mathman
• Searching for better definition of sequence., Dement
  • Re: Searching for better definition of seque