Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
E. E. Escultura
>The three axioms are all listed in my first post of Jan. 5. At any rate, here are the
>axioms of the new real number system R*, +, x.
>1) R* contains the basic integers 0, 1, . . ., 9.
>2) The addition table
>3) The multiplication table.
Those aren't axioms in the sense that anyone else uses the word. As
far as anyone can tell by reading statement 1, R* is exactly the set
{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}.
I want a formal axiomatization in the sense of mathematical logic. I
want the signature of your theory and the axioms written as formal
sentences in predicate calculus using that signature. Only then can
you claim that you have actually stated the axioms.
You ignored my question about what you consider a proof to be. What
inference rules do you allow? How can you draw a conclusion that isn't
an axiom already?
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
... And they communicate ... if all I give you is the signature. ... The axioms are what matter, and, in fact, even THEY could be phrased ... which are the only OTHER way to clarify what the predicate MEANS. ... (sci.logic) - Re: Contradicrtion-free mathemattics (The new nonstandard analysis
... >The three axioms are all listed in my first post of Jan. 5. ... I want a formal axiomatization in the sense of mathematical logic. ... sentences in predicate calculus using that signature. ... (sci.math) - Re: Continuum hypothesis
... set of axioms, T_0. ... entails absence of any inputs to the first-order-language construction ... IS NO P IN THE SIGNATURE, how can you get P into the language? ... (sci.logic) - Re: Axioms of Boolean Algebra got from Concept Algebra
... the following 3 axioms define boolean algebra: ... Your axioms, and therefore your signature, ... But this axiomatization shows that the "underlying" signature and ... (sci.logic) - Re: Torkel Franzen on truth
... The axioms are characterizable AS such SYNTACTICALLY, ... And they communicate ... if all I give you is the signature. ... I give you a formal syntax with the signature of the language of PA. ... (sci.logic) |
|