Re: JSH: Same old crap

fishfry wrote: 
In article <drmunq$dn9$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
 Gib Bogle <bogle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Proginoskes wrote:


David C. Ullrich wrote:


On 27 Jan 2006 00:08:56 -0800, "Proginoskes" <CCHeckman@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:



jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:


I'm stuck with few options with you journal killers [...] 

"Journal killers"? Do you really think that's what all the "sci.math"
people are capable of?


The funny thing is that we don't matter, the only one that matters
is him. We're just toys for his amusement, etc etc etc. But in
spite of that we're able to kill journal articles and even whole
journals.



It reminds me of Johnny Cochrane's arguments in the O.J. Simpson trial,
where he claimed (1) the LAPD was too incompetant to do a DNA test
correctly, and (2) they were masterminds because they were able to get
some of Simpson's DNA and plant it at the scene.

BTW, have any other suspects been brought to trial for those murders?
We know the guilty party looks exactly like OJS.

Cochrane knew his jury. Now if the truth/falsity of JSH's claims were to be decided by jury, he might have a chance.



If the roots don't fit, math is ***. 

LOL
.

Quantcast