Re: JSH: No FLT proof claim
In article <1138855677.597138.18770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
> I'm wondering how this problem though with Galois Theory not working
> the way it's taught
Can you explain the specific problem you've found with Galois theory?
Summarize it in words, like "a certain equation has roots that both are
and aren't algebraic integers," or whatever you claim is.
Exactly what do you think you've discovered?
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: New paper, algebraic integers, Galois Theory
... > Now consider the case that m, f, and u are algebraic integers, then I ... > something about the factors of roots of monic polynomials with integer ... Note that this claim does not require Galois Theory, ...
(sci.math) - Re: JSH: The "Published" paper he dosent what you to know about.
... are algebraic integers. ... and Galois theory both say that none of the roots are ... And since you are saying that Galois theory is ... you must be saying that it is wrong in the ring ...
(sci.math) - Re: Some math, algebraic integers
... |ENTIRE BASIS for Galois Theory as it's taught is that when you can't ... |just simplify the square root, like you can with sqrt, then your ... |limitation is a limitation on the underlying roots!!! ... Look at any textbook in Galois theory. ...
(sci.math) - Re: JSH: The "Published" paper he dosent what you to know about.
... the "Over Iinterpertations of Galois Theory" by mathematicians. ... Determining the distribution of factors within irrational algebraic integers ... one of the a's is coprime to 5. ... that are themselves polynomials. ...
(sci.math) - Re: My paper, and the cheaters
... As for repeating arguments, you consistently refused to answer basic ... That is, given two algebraic integers a and b, ... > and this is a factorization of the required form. ... > end up with a contradiction of either Galois theory or basic ...
(sci.math) |
|
