Re: JSH: Decker example, end of an era
- From: "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 09:50:25 +0100
jstevh@xxxxxxx writes:
So Galois Theory as a way to determine where factors go is refuted, and
it is proven that the ring of algebraic integers is incomplete[...]
James, I know you're a busy guy and all, but I am still waiting for a
definition of "complete" here. What does it mean when you say that
the ring of algebraic integers is not complete? Which of Dedekind's
theorems is thereby refuted? And how does this contradict Galois
theory?
Some of us are a bit slow here and could use even simpler
explanations.
This post marks the end of an era in the world of mathematics.
Pretty much have to, wouldn't it?
--
"We want a single platform. We're trying to get there using the
carrot, or blackmail, or rewards, or whatever you call it."
-- Madison, WI, superintendent Rainwater grasps subtlety in the
operating system wars.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JSH: Decker example, end of an era
- From: jstevh
- Re: JSH: Decker example, end of an era
- Prev by Date: Re: Help on a inequality!
- Next by Date: Re: poker
- Previous by thread: Pentagonal Tiling Question
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: Decker example, end of an era
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|