Re: JSH: Even shorter, disproof
- From: Gib Bogle <bogle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 20:54:21 +1300
I get the impression that you're new here - in any case, I don't recall seeing you responding to JSH until recently. You should know that many people have been down the path that you're on, taking JSH seriously, patiently and exhaustively detailing the errors in his mathematical efforts, trying to explain them to him in the clearest possible terms.
Most of these people no longer respond to JSH. They eventually tired of being rewarded with insults for attempting to educate him. You see, if you disagree with JSH, and in particular if you do it a very reasoned way, he will accuse you of being a liar.
It does you credit that you persevere, but I predict that you'll soon discover how fruitless is this effort.
Gib
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JSH: Even shorter, disproof
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: JSH: Even shorter, disproof
- References:
- JSH: Even shorter, disproof
- From: jstevh
- Re: JSH: Even shorter, disproof
- From: William Hughes
- Re: JSH: Even shorter, disproof
- From: marcus_b
- Re: JSH: Even shorter, disproof
- From: jstevh
- Re: JSH: Even shorter, disproof
- From: marcus_b
- Re: JSH: Even shorter, disproof
- From: jstevh
- Re: JSH: Even shorter, disproof
- From: marcus_b
- Re: JSH: Even shorter, disproof
- From: jstevh
- Re: JSH: Even shorter, disproof
- From: marcus_b
- JSH: Even shorter, disproof
- Prev by Date: Re: Finding info about a projectile
- Next by Date: Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- Previous by thread: Re: JSH: Even shorter, disproof
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: Even shorter, disproof
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|