Re: What Software to Type Math In?

Herman Rubin <hrubin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <ds3l1c$4at$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Justin <no@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
LuckyOne <gwlucky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

: Did LaTex put something in everyone's coffee? You folks remind me of
: religious converts who constantly have to convince themselves they like
: their new religion. You protest and protect far too much. Use what
: you like and I'll get on with my life never having had a problem with
: the equation editor I have.

The difference being that religions are all relative whereas with
typesetting there are some tangible measurements.

Latex is more powerful and more flexible than any other typesetting method
out there. That's not to say that others won't fit the bill in small
applications or if your needs are fairly limited, but if you need the
maximum amount of kick it's Latex or bust, basically. This is why it's
grown to be the default in mathematics, and this is what the original
poster was asking anyway.

The problem is that Latex, and the others, are typeSETTIMG
methods, and this is always complicated. Very often, one
wants typing methods which do not necessarily produce good
looking output, but produce readable output quickly, and
without using horrible notational strings. Typing 100
characters when 10 will do is not a good idea. I frequently
type mathematics without writing it first, and TeX, which I
have used, and its derivative Latex, which I have not, just
require too much window-dressing.

I wonder, what an alternative "typing method" should be and which
"horrible notational strings" you have met. Alternating between keyboard and
mouse-driven menues does not strike me as particular timesaving alternative.
Of course, I do not know what you use now; you may well feel that none of
the currently available systems meets your needs.

The more fundamental point is, to what extent you can take advantage of the
division of labour in the process of typesetting your document.

If there is somebody else available who can take care of the typesetting
aspect of your document, you may as well say "I just want to type it quickly,
the _final_appearance_ of the document is not _my_ business". And of course
this makes sense. The same applies, if the final appearance does not matter
as such, e.g. in a personal not for yourself.
(even in this case, I would feel _very_ uncomfortable with a format that
is not plain text and where readability depends on the existence of a
particular version of a particular software)

If instead, the final appearance matters and can not be delegated to somebody
else, one may as well start right away with the real thing. As far as I
could see, this is to be the situation of the OP.


Another advantage of at typewriter rather than a typesetter
is that the author has easy control of line breaks. Also,
fixed width fonts are necessary for easy communication.
This goes completely against the typesetting mentality.

Depending on the final format it might also go completely against
the idea of readability. Nobody suggested that you typeset your e-mail.

In fact, easy documentation depends on plain text format.
This is one of the reasons for using TeX and LaTeX, even if all the
fine points of typesetting are ignored.

But of course, I have no interest in missionising anybody. You will know
much better than I, what you want.

Marc
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: What Software to Type Math In?
    ... : their new religion. ... The problem is that Latex, and the others, are typeSETTIMG ... This goes completely against the typesetting mentality. ... Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Replacing BibTeX (was: biblatex-apa - work underway)
    ... typesetting language. ... Which means "replacing biblatex" is a ... and that's the split in this debate - it started about LaTeX ... only and ended up as a general bib system debate which means there is ...
    (comp.text.tex)
  • Re: LaTeX and Context in the Humanities
    ... Humanities make of LaTeX or Context. ... I use LaTeX for typesetting works on classical philology and ... I have a guide up on it at ... as well as a guide on typesetting Old Church Slavonic at ...
    (comp.text.tex)
  • Re: Critique on Def. of Convergence
    ... I must say that the typesetting is pretty ugly. ... you might download a copy of LyX. ... This is a document processor based on LaTeX, ... mathematicians. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Which text editor is better for writing scientific papers?
    ... But I not sure how many journals still use LaTeX for typesetting. ... one of the few mathematicians who does not use LaTeX, ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)