Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- From: cet1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Chris Thompson)
- Date: 13 Feb 2006 19:53:35 GMT
In article <1138602995.032726.74020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Proginoskes <CCHeckman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Minus XVII wrote:
I think it's just his comprehension of english,
taht gets him no end of trouble in satisfying neccesity and/
or sufficiency, or even defining the problem at first reading.
He grew up in the United States and learned English. If he had just
gotten off the boat, he'd have an excuse. As it is, he's just as
stubborn as a dachshund.
What we need are badgers that can bite back _hard_. So far he seems
to have suffered only minor flesh wounds.
--
Chris Thompson
Email: cet1 [at] cam.ac.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- Prev by Date: Re: What Software to Type Math In?
- Next by Date: Re: JSH Summery #4
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- Next by thread: Re: Why Archimedes Plutonium will never proof the 4CT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|